Indiana Jones and the Web Buzz of Doom
by Ray Greene
posted May 13, 2008 4:22 PM
Message control is a passion if not a fetish for Lusasfilm Ltd. - and I speak from professional experience. Back when I was Editor-in-Chief of Boxoffice, Lucasfilm once took the unprecedented step of exercising their alleged right to recall any file photos of George Lucas they had provided to us, based on the boilerplate “Property of/Used by Permission” language each image contained. They weren’t even pissed off - at least as far as I know. They just told me George liked to control the use of his image, and that we were free to contact them for a picture if we wrote anything about him in the future. We opted to use wildly out-dated, pre-Lucasfilm shots from the set of “American Graffiti” as an inside joke every time we mentioned the man instead.
That kind of behavior seems quaint in the web era, where “information wants to be free” as they say. So it was almost inevitable that bad internet buzz would eventually start circulating about the new Lucas/Spielberg “Indiana Jones” movie, and almost as certain that the place it would first emanate from would be Harry Knowles’ aintitcoolnews.com website - the Drudge Report for people who collect extremely expensive action figures. Sample line: “those of you that feel that the new Star Wars Movies robbed your childhood, expect some molestations from Uncles' George and Steven.” Ouch! But not unexpected. At some level, even Lucas and Spielberg had to be anticipating this.
What’s interesting though, especially for Boxoffice readers, is that “ShogunMaster,” the anonymous source of the widely discussed aintitcoolnews.com “review” of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is an EXHIBITOR, according to the New York Times, which tracked the man down.
Exhibition was always going to be the soft white underbelly of Lucasfilm’s defense against pre-release word-of-mouth, because of archaic state laws against the “blind-bidding” practices of the old Hollywood studios. In the bad old days, exhibitors were frequently forced to bid on movies they hadn’t seen, which meant a turkey with a couple of stars in it could ignite a bidding war, no matter how crummy the movie turned out to be. About twenty statehouses legislated mandatory industry screenings for bookers to ensure this wouldn’t occur, and those laws are still on the books.
As the Times’ article points out, such laws no longer serve as clear a purpose. The major exhibition circuits are countrywide entities on an industrial scale that surpasses the Hollywood studio of the “mogul” era (very roughly, the period from 1920 to 1950), and the movies they book come not from territorial auctions but via direct negotiations with distributors. Independents and smaller circuits negotiate directly too, albeit with less leverage.
Still, state-legislated exhibitor screenings are already being held. And now an exhibitor - and maybe a prominent one - is crying “Wolf!” on the most anticipated sequel of the summer.
There are a few things that seem a little queasy (if typical of the “new media” era) in all of this. By writing his opinion anonymously, “ShogunMaster’s” possibly mixed motives for his criticisms are impossible to determine. The Times mentions in passing that “theater executives may have an incentive to play down a movie’s prospects after such a screening, to get better terms,” although it has to be said that slagging a picture that could fuel a record summer if it ignites moviegoing the way its predecessors did seems like a hell of a way to conduct a theater business.
But there’s also a small bit of poetic justice at work here too. In the opinion vacuum Spielberg and Lucas have so meticulously authored, measurable damage will surely result, simply because writers with actual names, jobs and outlets haven’t had a crack at seeing the picture yet.
There’s a phrase for it that goes all the way back to the Middle Ages, source of the artifact unearthed by Harrison Ford in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.
It’s called being “hoisted by your own petard.”
Of course there's another possibility, which is that Indiana Jones and the Kingdon of the Crystal Skull is okay without being great (like every Indiana Jones movie but the first one, come to think of it), and that those clever folks at Lucasfilm and in the Spielberg camp are limiting expectations by ALLOWING ShogunMaster to use aintitcoolnews to lower the bar so that the resultant mediocrity seems brilliant by comparison. This would mean that Knowles, the New York Times and now Boxoffice are all being suckered, and playing right into their hands.
But maybe I'd better save that kind of paranoid thinking for the X-Files sequel...
1 Comments
Leave a comment


Ray Greene is a journalist, documentary filmmaker and educator. His book Hollywood Migraine was an L.A. Times bestseller; his movie Schlock! The Secret History of American Movies was a festival hit, a Time Out New York critic's pick and is available from Pathfinder DVD. Among Ray's proudest achievements is his long affiliation with Boxoffice, where he was Editor-in-Chief for much of the 1990s. Ray conceived and created the original Boxoffice website back in 1993, making Boxoffice.com the first comprehensive internet film resource dedicated entirely to movies.

Wade Major is a veteran critic, author and filmmaker. A graduate of UCLA’s film and television program, his work has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, the New York Daily News and the Silver Lake Film Festival, among others. He has written or contributed to numerous books on Asian cinema, and is a featured audio commentator on such noteworthy DVD titles as André Techiné’s “Barocco,” Takashi Miike’s “Gozu” and the cult favorite, “Master of the Flying Guillotine.” He also appears regularly on the Reelz channel series “What it Takes” and NPR’s FilmWeek. He has written for Boxoffice since 1992.

Aside from being a critic for Boxoffice Magazine, Mark Keizer co-authored the book Ultimate DVD: The Essential Guide to Building Your DVD Collection, published by the Berkley Publishing Group. Keizer is also a seasoned television producer, most recently as Co-Executive Producer of Seasons 5 and 6 of Comedy Central’s The Man Show. Keizer’s other producing credits include the talk shows Later with Greg Kinnear, The Roseanne Show and The Late, Late Show with Tom Snyder, as well as the NBC primetime game show Dog Eat Dog and E!’s Talk Soup. Currently, Keizer is co-host of DVD DigiGods, a podcast available on iTunes and IGN.com.

Timothy Cogshell is a veteran Los Angeles based film writer and filmmaker. His writings on film have been published widely since 1990 both nationally and internationally. Like many of his noted colleagues (including Jean-Luc Godard, François Truffaut and Peter Bogdanovich), Tim is a filmmaker as well as a thoughtful analyst of the art and craft of cinema. His work includes writing, directing and producing feature and documentary projects for the screen and television. Tim is also the Producer of the internationally broadcast movie-news and information program - CineNews - which airs weekly around the world from the UK to New Zealand, across Latin America and throughout western and Eastern Europe. Tim holds a Master of Arts Degree, among others, and attended Columbia, Harvard and Oxford Universities.

A Politically Involved Adam Sandler is a Sign of the Apocalypse
'Hulk' Will Smash Marvel’s Winning Streak?
Sydney Pollack, or the Reactionary Hailed as a Visionary
Indiana Jones and the Web Buzz of Doom
Indiana Jones Watch: Or The Ballad Of Steven & George
Will Ferrell, Movie Comedy, And The Saturday Night Live Curse
Strange Bedfellows, or Why Celebrity Political Endorsements Suddenly Matter
Wake Up, Warner Bros.!: A Call To Action After The Folding Of New Line
Please Don’t Give Ellen Page the Oscar


Kyle Mitchell said:
"because of archaic state laws against the “blind-bidding” practices of the old Hollywood studios"
The only reason they are archaic is because there is no longer bidding. How can theatre owners be expected to buy films without seeing them first? How many things do you ever buy sight unseen? Try buying your next car by just talking to the dealer over the phone!
I contend that the national chains do get to see most all of the films before buying. It is the independents, such as myself, who are forced to make major decisions blindly.
If Hollywood doesn't want bad reviews out there, maybe they shouldn't make so many bad films. Instead they try to blind-side the movie-goers, which just makes more and more of them dissatisfied and turn away from theatres.
"Independents and smaller circuits negotiate directly too, albeit with less leverage."
Why is it that independents have so much less leverage?
Isn't a chain only as good as its worst manager? Are those managers paid enough to have a vested interest in what kind of experience movie-goers recieve?
An independent theatre owner's livelihood depends directly on every movie-goer wanting to come back again and again. Having a person with a vested interest in the movie-goers' experience operating the theatre day to day can make an independent theatre better than a chain, but the "leverage" many times does not allow the independent to have the good product.
This "leverage" ends up forcing some independents out of business, resulting in a lack of competition in the marketplace and a loss of competitive benefits to the movie-goers.
I think that films should be distributed by following the consumer choice instead of by how many screens a company owns across the country. Shouldn't movie-goers have all of the best choices if we expect them to attend more shows?
May 22, 2008 9:07 PM