Weekend Listomania (Special Masterpiece Theatre Edition)
posted August 22, 2008 5:37 PM
DVD Event of the Week: Is it Showtime/Paramount's box set of Dexter: The Complete Second Season, featuring Michael C. Hall as everybody's favorite serial killer/forensic specialist? Is it Universal's House: Season 4, featuring Hugh Laurie as everybody's favorite genius doctor/drug addled misanthrope? Or is it Focus Features' Miss Pettigrew Lives For a Day, featuring Frances McDormand as everybody's favorite governess/social climber?
All worthy, without a doubt, but for my money it's the Criterion Collection's two disc set of Salò, the 1976 adaptation of the Marquis de Sade's notorious 120 Days of Sodom by writer/director Pier Paolo Pasolini.
To be sure, I am not as convinced as some -- including the various critics, Gary Indiana and Catherine Breillat among them, who contribute notes to the excellent illustrated booklet included with the set -- that the film is a masterpiece. Some years ago New Republic film writer Stanley Kauffman noted that at some point, you have to make a crucial decision about Sade -- is he a revolutionary genius or merely a talented pervert? I personally tend toward the latter idea, although I will admit that Sade's Justine is rather deadpan funny in a Candide-ish sort of way; for the most part, though, his work strikes me as the overwrought self-serving ravings of a guy with, at the least, really serious issues. On the basis of Salò, which updates the story from the 18th century to the waning days of Mussolini's fascist Italy, you could probably say the same for Pasolini. The simulated horrors here, which are astoundingly graphic for the time -- torture, rape, murder, mutilation, coprophilia -- seem a little too gleefully personal, and (as with Sade) the supposed philosophical, political and esthetic undergirding seems like rather bogus (cue the Church Lady's "How convenient!") justification for the fact that their author is frankly getting off on them.

That said, there's no way around the notion that the film evokes a palpable feeling of nightmarish dread, as if one was encountering a distillation of pure evil; Pasolini, for all his demons, was probably more of an artist than his 18th century predecessor. Of course, something along those lines might describe a less pretentious (but equally transgressive) auteur like 60s gore pioneer Herschel Gordon Lewis, which is why I rather prefer watching Salò in the dubbed English language version Criterion includes along with the sub-titled Italian soundtrack; whoever the actors doing the English voices are, they're so community theater hammy that it makes the on-screen depravity easier to take, like the amateur emoting in Lewis's otherwise unwatchably appalling Blood Feast.
Whatever your take on Salò, however, it gets typically top shelf treatment by Criterion here. Disc one has a gorgeously sharp and detailed high-def letterboxed transfer of the uncut film, plus the original trailer. Disc two has three fascinating making-of documentaries (the first of which has interview footage of Pasolini, who was murdered, under shall we say Pasolini-esque circumstances, just after completing the film), as well as new interviews with production designer Dante Ferretti and film scholar Jean-Pierre Gorin. All in all, Les Fleurs de Mal have rarely had a more deluxe presentation; you can (and probably should) order the set here.
Okay, that said, and because things will be relatively quiet around here till Monday, here's an obviously relevant little project for us all:
Best/Most Faithful Film Adaptation of a Literary Classic!!!
And my totally top of my head Top Five is:
5. A Tale of Two Cities (Jack Conway, 1935)
Ronald Colman IS Sydney Carton in the role he was not only born to play but wanted to so much he was willing to shave off his trademark mustache to get.
4. Barry Lyndon (Stanley Kubrick, 1975)
"A remarkably accurate adaptation of Thackeray’s novel about the rise and fall of a duplicitous Irishman in eighteenth-century England. But by simply changing the point of view—turning the hero’s firstperson narration into a seemingly omniscient, though subtly fallible, third-person voice-over— Kubrick transformed a picaresque into a heartbreakingly ironic meditation on destiny." -- Bilge Ebiri, Bookforum.

3. The Heiress (William Wyler, 1949)
Henry James' Washington Square done to an absolute faretheewell. Great closing line: After barring the door to her her cad of a suitor, Olivia DeHaviland's aunt asks her how she can be so cruel, and she responds, "I have been taught by masters."
2. Catch-22 (Mike Nichols, 1970)
A book everyone assumed was unfilmmable, filmed brilliantly thanks in large measure to an all but perfect screenplay by Buck Henry. It would have been nice if they'd gotten Henry Fonda for the Major Major Major part, but you can't have everything
And the all time coolest cinematic translation of a great book, you gotta be kidding it's not even close so don't give me a hard time, obviously, is --
1. Clueless (Amy Heckerling,1995 )
Jane Austen's Emma, brilliantly updated for the 90201 generation,with an utterly winning Alicia Silverstone.
Awrighty now -- what would your choices be?
17 Comments
Leave a comment

Steve Simels has written about music and movies for Sound and Vision magazine (formerly Stereo Review) since the early 70s. He has also contributed to Entertainment Weekly, TV Guide and the Wall Street Journal. He’s the author of “Gender Chameleons: Androgyny in Rock n Roll” (Arbor House, 1985), and blogs at PowerPop.blogspot.com. His ambition in life is to play the Leslie Howard role in a remake of “Petrified Forest.”

Weekend Cinema Listomania (Special In the Not Too Distant Future Edition)
Great Lost Babes of the Twenties (An Occasional Series)
If It's Tuesday, It Must Be Shameless Filler (Special Storefront Hitchcock Edition)
Christmas Comes But Once a Year (A Recurring Series): Let Us Now Praise Famous Alter Kakers
Weekend Cinema Listomania: Special Coming to America Edition
What's UP Doc: The Search For a Cleverer Headline
Christmas Comes But Once a Year (A Recurring Series): The Bird is the Word
How Bad Could It Be? (An Occasional Series): Short People Got No Reason to Live
Weekend Cinema Listomania (Special They Walk Among Us! Edition)
Proof of the Existence of God (An Occasional Series)
Great Lost Films of the Nineties (An Occasional Series): Special Germans Behaving Badly Edition
Christmas Comes But Once a Year (The Return of a Recurring Series)
How Bad Could It Be? (An Occasional Series): In Praise of Older Women

ProfWombat said:
Joseph Losey's 'Ulysses': uneven, sure, and close to impossible of ambition, but in places it made your jaw drop
John Huston's 'The Dead'
'David Copperfield', for WC Fields as Micawber
August 21, 2008 9:26 PM
pretzelattack said:
i nominate cthulhu, as a faithful sample of h.p.lovecraft's seminal work alerting us the danger of the evil old ones. im just glad lovecraft isn't around for john mccain.
August 21, 2008 9:33 PM
Who Am Us Anyway said:
A River Runs Through It, written by a guy, Norman Maclean, who was supposed to be too old to do such a thing; & filmed by Robert Redford, who say what you will really gets this outdoors stuff.
August 21, 2008 9:54 PM
drano said:
"Thee Innocents" (1961) ought to be in there because its source, "The Turn of the Screw", is difficult and Deborah Kerr is great. Also the juveniles are unusually good. The adaptation interprets the story somewhat, which is interesting.
August 22, 2008 3:52 AM
The Kenosha Kid said:
Rashomon, by Kurosawa, adapted 2 Akutagawa short stories.
Full Metal Jacket by Kubrick, improves on "The Short Timers," a fairly lightweight novelette by Gustav Hasford.
L.A. Confidential.
August 22, 2008 6:14 AM
Gummo said:
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, wherein Terry Gilliam faithfully films the unfilmable.
(However, I can't nominate Cronenberg's Naked Lunch, because the movie is more ABOUT the book than an adaptation OF the book.)
And I will get pilloried for this, but I have to add Jackson's Lord of the Rings. Not only did he make a faithful adaptation of the book(s), in some ways he improved upon it/them.
And I second the 1935 David Copperfield, even though, viewed now, it's a breathless run through the high points of a novel everyone at the time would have been familiar with, sort of a Hollywood Cliff Notes version of a book.
And while we're talking Hollywood classics, we have to at least acknowledge Gone With the Wind, The Wizard of Oz, and Ben-Hur. And Frankenstein. And The Invisible Man. And Dracula.
August 22, 2008 6:31 AM
Trey said:
Gummo nailed it. I totally agree with Fear And Loathing, it totally reminded me of tripping, I mean if I had tripped or anything. He also got it on Lord Of The Rings, which was brilliant and looked the way it should.
Trey
August 22, 2008 7:24 AM
Mrs. Peel said:
Many Dickens adaptations: David Lean's "Great Expectations" with Alex Guinness, Jean Simmons, Martita Hunt, John Mills ... "A Christmas Carol" with Alastair Sim ...
"Hound of the Baskervilles" (the one with Rathbone and Bruce, of course)
And, since there are some contemporary books here;
"Gone With The Wind" - the book may not really be a classic, but the movie is fabulous.
August 22, 2008 10:51 AM
the former l'atalante said:
God knows why this comes to mind, because it's neither one of the best or even very faithful adaptations, but I have to mention Peter Sellers' collapse into real-life insanity with his film of Terry Southern's The Magic Christian, which managed to shoehorn Christopher Lee as Dracula together with Yul Brenner as a transvestite serenading Roman Polanski, and five seconds of Rachel Welch leading a topless all-girl rowing crew.
Sellers made sure to sabotage John Cleese's appearance in the film by using the latter's worst takes, and Cleese responded by delivering a brutal parody of the film's nominal director, Joseph McGrath, in the "Scott of the Antarctic" Monty Python sketch.
August 22, 2008 6:09 PM
dave™© said:
You must be the only guy on the planet who liked Nichols' version of "Catch 22"!
As for faithful adaptations, I'd have to give it to Huston's "Maltese Falcon," the screenplay for which is really just a marked-up copy of the book.
August 23, 2008 7:19 AM
Anonymous said:
Buck Henry is such a surprising talented guy.
And I gotta go with dave@ on 'Maltese Falcon'.
And Steve, since you solved my 'old joanna' puzzle the other day,, I'll let the grouting slide.
August 23, 2008 10:41 AM
Ruth said:
No one named A Clockwork Orange? me, then. Kubrick, of course.
Don't know if you will stretch the category of film to include PBS - but I, Claudius makes an incredible viewing experience out of a good couple of books - and Jacobi is amazing.
August 23, 2008 12:00 PM
Dominic said:
Rosemary's Baby (1968, Roman Polanski)
August 23, 2008 1:08 PM
Toonscribe said:
I nominate Ken Russell's adaptation of D. H. Lawrence's "Women in Love."
August 24, 2008 11:27 AM
Monica, Daughter of Simels said:
"The Godfather".
August 24, 2008 1:39 PM
Hecate, Runymeade Conspirator said:
simels
You write so well about film. I would click over here to read what you write and then click through all the other links no matter what!
August 24, 2008 1:41 PM
Anonymous said:
I'll also go with Gummo on LOTR, and with Ruth on A Clockwork Orange. I didn't really like either book or the movie, but I think movie was an excellent adaptation.
Buckeye, Dealer of Rare Coins
August 24, 2008 1:46 PM