The Sky Above, The Mud Below
posted June 24, 2009 6:41 AM
Okay, the other day I threatened to say something about the new 40th anniversary director's cut of Woodstock and being nothing if not a man of my word, here goes.
I think I like Wolfen -- director Michael Wadleigh's other, scarier movie -- better. And this despite the fact that Woodstock has music by The Who and Jimi Hendrix, while Wolfen has music by...uber Titanic hack James Horner.
There....I didn't mean to say it, but you dragged it out of me.
Perhaps I should clarify. First of all, I didn't go to Woodstock, although a lot of my friends did, because I expected it to be pretty much what it actually turned out to be, i.e., a hippie convention with poor sanitation in which a bunch of vague dots on the horizon (translation: rock groups) provided tribal muzak. In retrospect, I'll grant you that might actually have been a fun way to kill a weekend, but let's just say I knew it probably wasn't going to be my cup of tea.
Heh heh. He said "tea."
Anyway, when the movie came out the next year, I dutifully attended a showing, and although the sanitation at the Oritani Theater in Hackensack New Jersey was undoubtedly better than that at the festival, I found the film mostly underwhelming. The bands I liked -- the aforementioned Who, for example -- didn't seem to be enjoying themselves, there were far too many acts I didn't like who did, and the whole thing just seeemed to go on forever. Frankly, I thought the completely out of sync with the festival's ethos Sha-Na-Na, whose "At the Hop" clocked in at less than three minutes and who provided pretty much the only laughs in the whole interminable three plus hours, stole the movie, but perhaps that only goes to show what a peculiarly adversarial relationship I had with the 60s.
Alright, all that said, Warner Home Video's new Woodstock package puts about the best face on the event and the movie as you could hope for. On the most basic level, that means the film has been completely remastered from the original elements, and it looks and (especially) sounds better than ever (Hendrix engineer Eddie Kramer worked on the new 5.1 surround mixes). There's also about three weeks worth of new making-of docs and interviews (including, bizarrely, a conversation with director Wadleigh and Hugh Hefner) and 18 unearthed bonus performances. The latter are generally less interesting than you'd expect, with the exception of a three song Creedence Clearwater Revival set with the band at their peak, and a jaw-droppingly out of tune Sha Na Na take on "Teen Angel" that's one of the most intensely funny things I've ever seen.
Anyway, here's the DVD trailer to give you an idea what I'm talking about.
Bottom line: You can -- and I suppose should -- order it here.
And now -- where's my anniversary Wolfen edition?
6 Comments
Leave a comment

Steve Simels has written about music and movies for Sound and Vision magazine (formerly Stereo Review) since the early 70s. He has also contributed to Entertainment Weekly, TV Guide and the Wall Street Journal. He’s the author of “Gender Chameleons: Androgyny in Rock n Roll” (Arbor House, 1985), and blogs at PowerPop.blogspot.com. His ambition in life is to play the Leslie Howard role in a remake of “Petrified Forest.”

Great Lost Films of the 70s: A Room With a View
Great Lost Films of the 60s: An Unexamined Life
Weekend Cinema Listomania (Special A Life Less Ordinary Edition)
Thursday Shameless Star Wars Filler
Great Moments in What Were They Thinking? (An Occasional Series)
How Bad Could It Be?: Future Shlock
If It's Monday, It Must Be Shameless Filler: Great Lost Babes of the 40s
Back to the Future: The Final Chapter
How Bad Could It Be?: Pants on Fire
The Last Avatar: Special Flogging a Deceased Equine Edition
If It's Monday, It Must Be Shameless Filler: Danish Pastry Edition
Weekend Cinema Listomania (Special Feels Like the First Time! Edition)
I Was a Teenage Avatar: My Last Word On the Subject (Seriously. I Promise.)

Sid Sherman said:
You weren't at Woodstock? I distinctly remember meeting you at the Bummer Tent.
June 24, 2009 7:18 AM
Gwen De Marco said:
I didn't go either, for the same reasons. And I'm still not sorry. :-)
June 24, 2009 9:02 AM
Gummo said:
My big brother went to Woodstock (I was a mere bar-mitzvah-aged lad at the time).
He took with him a backpack, a tent and a sleeping bag. Came bag with the ragged clothes on his back.
But I do love the movie. Lotta great music, innovative visual stylings that avoids almost all of the 60s excesses of shaking cameras and psychedelic effects, and some very telling in-the-crowd moments.
And to the end of his life, Abbie Hoffman insisted that Townsend never kicked him off the stage, despite the existence of audio AND video evidence proving him wrong.
June 24, 2009 9:17 AM
Cousin Kevin said:
A friend of mine went to both Woodstock AND Altamont.
To this day, he swears he had more fun at the latter.
A better movie, too....
June 24, 2009 6:35 PM
cthulhu said:
In many interviews in the days / months / years after Woodstock, all of the members of the Who confirmed that they hated the whole thing. Typical quote - "worst show we ever played." According to Dave Marsh's Who bio, Before I Get Old, the band had to threaten to not go on stage to get the promoters to pay them - "after all, it's a free concert now!"
I was way too young to go to Woodstock or even know about it until years later. But in the early 80's while I was attending a college-that-shall-remain-nameless, I took an honors colloquium called "The History and Culture of the 1960's." One class period, we watched the first hour or so of the original film - Ritchie Havens, Joe Cocker, the Who, Joan Baez, etc. - and then had a class discussion:
Professor: So, what did you think?
Me: The Who were great, and everything else was good except Joan Baez.
Stuck-Up Sorority Girl: How can you possibly like any of that horrible music better than Neil Diamond and Barbra Streisand??!!
Professor: Do you like Tommy better or Who's Next better? My son took up the drums after hearing Tommy, but I think that Who's Next is musically more powerful...
I got an A.
June 24, 2009 9:31 PM
RFWoodstock said:
RADIO WOODSTOCK 69 which features only music from the original Woodstock era and RADIO WOODSTOCK with music from the original Woodstock era to today’s artists who reflect the spirit of Woodstock are both available at WOODSTOCKUNIVERSE.COM.
Peace, love, music,
RFWoodstock
rfwoodstock@gmail.com
June 25, 2009 8:24 AM