Weekend Cinema Listomania (Special Waste Vastland Edition)
posted November 27, 2009 5:04 AM
Video Event of the Week: Could Sony's Blu-ray or DVD of Angels and Demons, the profoundly silly DaVinci Code follow-up with Tom Hanks going head to head with The Illuminati, make the cut? Might Blue Underground's Blu-ray upgrade of Gillian Armstrong's wonderful coming of age in the outback flick My Brilliant Career, conceivably get the nod? Or -- and I'll stipulate that this is rather unlikely -- might Universal's various disc incarnations of Judd Apatow's latest mix of dick jokes and sentimentality, Funny People , by any chance be The One?
All worthy, to be sure, even (up to a point) that last, but for my money it's got to be the Criterion Collection's splendid new three-disc box set of kinescoped live TV drama (and comedy) classics from the 50s -- The Golden Age of Television.
The set, as you might have suspected, is based on the PBS series of the same name, which originally aired in the early 80s, and it features eight of the most memorable shows from a remarkably innovative era (1953-58) -- Marty, Patterns, No Time For Sergeants (which made Andy Griffith an overnight star), A Wind From the South, Bang the Drum Slowly, Requiem for a Heavyweight, The Comedian and Days of Wine and Roses. Many of the writers are icons today (Paddy Chayevsky, Rod Serling and Ernest Lehmann), there are early star turns by the likes of Paul Newman and Kim Hunter, and several of the directors (most notably John Frankenheimer) went on to do innovative work in 60s films. Many of the shows themselves became memorable films as well, although not always with their TV creative teams; Blake Edwards, for example, did the film adaptation of Roses, which apparently irked original director Frankenheimer no end.
Here's a brief clip from one of the most famous of the dramas -- Jack Palance in Serling's Requiem -- to give you an idea, especially if you're too young to remember what live television was like. (Criterion's transfer looks vastly better, BTW).
One thing needs to be said to put the set in perspective, however, which is that the whole Golden Age deal is just a tad bogus. All these shows are terrific, to be sure (there's a real sense of a new medium being born) and richly deserve Criterion's deluxe archive treatment, but the unglamorous fact is that they were anomalies in their day. Sturgeon's Law -- that 90 percent of everything is crap -- held as true for live TV in the 50s as any place else, and you could just as easily make the case for the 80s (after Hill Street Blues) or the current decade (The Sopranos, to pick just one example on cable) as TV's Golden Age.
That allowed, the set is an undeniable treasure trove, but if I had to pick just one of the shows for a desert island, it would have to be Lehmann, Serling and Frankenheimer's The Comedian. Apart from being one of the most devastating back-stage show-biz dramas ever, with a title performance by Mickey Rooney that will erase the memory of decades of the Mick's buffonish behavior for anyone who gets a gander at it, but it's also (ironically, in that it wasn't subsequently remade as a film) the most fluently cinematic thing in the set; a lot of it, in fact, plays like a warm-up for some of the more media-savvy sequences in its director's later The Manchurian Candidate.
Criterion's versions of the PBS shows (which, as previously noted, are surprisingly watchable given the technological limitations of the original kinescopes) come with the original interviews with many of the the principals, including Julie Haris, Piper Laurie, Palance, and Rooney; there are also new audio commentaries by directors Frankenheimer, Ralph Nelson, Delbert Mann and Daniel Petrie (Mann's track for Marty is particularly interesting).
In any case, you can -- and quite obviously should -- order The Golden Age of Television from Criterion over here.
That said, and because things will doubtless be pretty quite around here due to excess turkey consumption, here's a relevant and hopefully fun little project to keep us occupied for the rest of the weekend:
Best or Worst Big-Screen-to-Television or Television-to-Big-Screen Adaptation!!!
Arbitrary rule: None of the films based on the shows in the Criterion set under discussion are eligible. Sorry.
And my totally top of my head Top Five are:
5.Captain Video: Master of the Stratosphere (Spencer Gordon Bennett and Wallace Grissell, 1951)

Cheesy even by late serial standards, but worth noting in that it probably cost only marginally more to make than the no-budget TV show it was based on. Tragically, star Judd Holdren (above left) died in 1974 of poisoning by Z-Rays from Outer Space.
4. The X-Files: I Want to Believe (Chris Carter, 2008)
I really have nothing to say about this one, except that -- like most fans of the TV show and its previous feature film incarnation from 1998 -- I have decided to forget that it ever existed.
3. Speed Racer (Larry and Andy Wachowski, 2008)
A strong contender for worst big-budget movie ever made, but give its makers credit -- after this, nobody could talk about Post-Modernism as a serious esthetic ever again. An impressive accomplishment, obviously, although now that I think of it, a similar claim could be made for both of the Charlie's Angels adaptations.
2. Stargate: SG-1 (1997-2007)
Not only light years better than the preposterously stupid film it was based on (directed by Roland Emmerich, and we should have seen the rest of his ouevre coming) but for ten seasons the most consistently entertaining and least self-important sci-fi series in TV history. Honorable mention: Alien Nation (1989-90), which actually improved upon and enriched the concepts only hinted at in the otherwise highly entertaining sci-fi flick of the same name.
And the numero uno most perversely memorable TV-to-Film or Film-to-TV derivation obviously is --
1. Delta House (1979)
The Animal House spin-off, featuring almost everybody from the original film except John Belushi, which should have been a warning sign from the get. Remarkably, the series managed to survive for a surprising 15 episodes despite being almost 100 percent laugh free.
Alrighty then -- what would your choices be?
17 Comments
Leave a comment

Steve Simels has written about music and movies for Sound and Vision magazine (formerly Stereo Review) since the early 70s. He has also contributed to Entertainment Weekly, TV Guide and the Wall Street Journal. He’s the author of “Gender Chameleons: Androgyny in Rock n Roll” (Arbor House, 1985), and blogs at PowerPop.blogspot.com. His ambition in life is to play the Leslie Howard role in a remake of “Petrified Forest.”

Weekend Cinema Listomania (Special The Mirror Crack'd Edition)
Thursday DVD Alert: Manny, Moe and Jack
Peter Graves 1926-2010: Over Oveur
Monday Shameless Filler: Special Creature Features Edition
Weekend Cinema Listomania (Special First Do No Harm Edition)
Things That Make You Go "Huh?"
How Bad Could It Be?: Who Let Les Chiens Out?
Tuesday Video Roundup: Special Gratuitous Avatar Joke Edition
Monday Post-Oscar Mea Culpa: Love, Doggy Style
Weekend Cinema Listomania (Special Teen Scream Edition)
Great Lost Babes of Whenever: In Praise of Hyphens
How Bad Could It Be?: Cottage Cheese in a Blizzard

Otis Adelbert Kline said:
You've understated the awfulness of Speed Racer.
November 27, 2009 5:30 AM
filkertom said:
I'm pretty worried about M. Night Sha-na-na's take on The Last Airbender. It's supposed to be fast-paced, exciting, and fun, three things M. Night is not at all known for.
November 27, 2009 5:49 AM
Steve Simels said:
After that last thing of his about the killer trees I'm not sure -- is M. Night even still allowed to make movies?
November 27, 2009 5:52 AM
nintochka said:
M*A*S*H
la femme nikita
rocky and bullwinkle
ferris bueller's day off
November 27, 2009 6:31 AM
the ruester said:
Christ, X-Files was my favorite show of all time.
They really ruined it by getting married. The new movie is like 2 hours of pillow talk about psychics. It's like "The Ghost Whisperer" with a budget. Aaaargh!!!
November 27, 2009 6:48 AM
Gummo said:
Star Trek V -- Kirk vs. God. Kirk wins. (Is anyone surprised that Shatner directed this turkey?)
One of the best adaptations of a TV show to the movies was the Addams Family movies -- everything, from the casting to the sensibility, was right (of course, there was source material that predated both TV and movie versions).
MST3K: The Movie -- When the eagerly awaited movie version of your beloved cult TV show is both shorter and less funny than a typical episode of the show, you know you're in trouble.
November 27, 2009 7:10 AM
peter spencer said:
How about the various SNL sketches that went big-screen? Starting with the Blues Brothers (a big plus in my book) then Coneheads (ditto) and Dragnet (not so much).
November 27, 2009 8:48 AM
Allan Rosenberg said:
The 2nd X-Files movie was real good. Sorry it could live up to all the expectations but watch it again, a real solid episode.
November 27, 2009 9:43 AM
Steve Simels said:
The best I can say about the 2nd X-Files movie is that it had a really striking poster.
November 27, 2009 9:49 AM
dave™© said:
Regarding "Delta House," I don't believe Peter Reigert, Karen Allen, or (natch) Donald Sutherland were in it. And Josh Mostel played "Blotto." Yeesh!
As for "Star Trek V," it really is as bad as everyone says except for two things: Laurence Luckinbill and, oddly enough, DeForest Kelly, who gives his best performance in a Star Trek movie in it.
November 27, 2009 1:03 PM
dave™© said:
It's very difficult to pick which is better - the TV version of "Requiem for a Heavyweight" or the film version. The TV version, of course, has Jack Palance, but it also has a rushed, "happy" ending. The movie has Anthony Quinn replacing Palance, which isn't necessarily an improvement in my book, but it also has a great turn by Jackie Gleason as Quinn's manager and what was probably the "original" ending, which is incredibly downbeat.
The Serling "Playhouse 90" I really want to see, though, is "The Velvet Alley," a rather autobiographical tale of a struggling writer who hits it big in television and sells out the agent that carried and nurtured during all the lean years. With Art Carney as the writer, Jack Klugman as the agent, and Leslie Nielsen as a fellow writer who schools Carney on the facts of life...
November 27, 2009 1:12 PM
Steve Simels said:
Okay, let's try this again (comments ate my comments):
DAVE:
I never heard of that "Velvet Alley" but it sounds remarkable. I think I need to do some further research.
But as for STAR TREK V, I have to say this, but bad as it is, Shatner's direction has a certain crude energy I rather like. The Lawrence of Arabia cribs are kind of audacious and well done, I think, and as I said, it's got a certain zotz the other Treks lack.
IMHO, as crazy as that sounds.
November 27, 2009 7:55 PM
Who Am Us Anyway? said:
is M. Night even still allowed to make movies?
He is! I say M. Knight brought fourth Sixth Sense & I say he’s just GOT to have another great movie in him somewhere. Air Bender doesn’t look like it is it though. For one thing, the kid in the Air Bender trailer is too reminiscent of the Star Wars Kid for comfort. But for fans, following M. Knight is like following the Chicago Cubs: there is always next year.
November 27, 2009 9:57 PM
Steve Simels said:
Who Am Us:
With all due respect, I think at this point we have to assume that The Sixth Sense was a fluke.
November 28, 2009 8:22 AM
Gwen De Marco said:
"The Odd Couple" translated well from movie to tv. Great casting helped.
November 28, 2009 11:58 AM
Nosmo King said:
People, have you forgotten the bottomless pit of surrealistic mediocrity that is "The Avengers", with Uma Thurman and Ralph Fiennes? Not that the original is actually that much better --I know Diana Rigg can do no wrong, but has there ever been a more smug, unlikeable, self-satisfied lead actor than Patrick Macnee? But the Thurman-Fiennes version is a toxic cocktail of oddness, unbelievability and dreariness (it's not even so bad it's fun) that is almost unique in TV readaptation, and that says a lot.
Of course, I never saw Lost In Space, so maybe I missed something even worse…
November 29, 2009 11:12 PM
mcpart said:
The Avengers movie looked awful, but the show
was wonderful.
December 1, 2009 9:34 AM