DVD Spotlight

Sukiyaki Western Django

posted November 18, 2008 12:31 PM

By Joe Galm

One screen is what it opened on and four screens, its peak, is where it died; a paltry sum of $50,659 being its reward. In all honesty, I can’t say that the grim fate of Takashi Miike’s (Audition) latest was unjust, no. This was warranted … this was warranted.

sukiyakidvd.jpg

Quentin Tarantino loves films. He loves making them and he loves watching them. A man who once described the filmography of Stanley Kubrick as “cold,” Tarantino slants to the side of interaction and movement, manipulating his own inspirations into something of personable warmth and relation. Especially evident in Pulp Fiction, Tarantino proves that forgotten motifs can be milk for new and exciting content. It’s a form of recycling, in a way, and not just movements are reused but actors too.

As of late though, there’s been a change. Instead of trying to make cohesive expressions by utilizing past works as a focal point, Tarantino has opted to start schilling schlock and offering it as passable entertainment. It started with Grindhouse, an overlong, painfully glorified product of the YouTube generation. It hasn’t stopped here though as he continues to distract himself by producing more imitational trash, dubbing himself as some grand “presenter” as if these are indeed cinematic gifts for us to treasure and enjoy. I could do without them entirely.

While Sukiyaki Western Django may not be produced by Tarantino, he certainly had a stake in it. The western/samurai hybrid reeks of grindhouse excess, though it contains an even more miserable thematic basis. Here, Miike drew his inspirations from classic sources, loosely basing this work upon A Fistful of Dollars while showing shades of Henry VI and Once Upon a Time in the West as well. Other influences are abound in smaller strokes, but Miike seems content in showcasing these sources, which he knowingly can’t duplicate, and producing a trashy, ultraviolent ode to the male id. The entire film seems like an exercise on the filmmakers part to see just how creatively violent they can make it, reigning blood and bullets as if they were confetti at some twisted ticker-tape parade.

The plot is loosely followed at best. Two rival gangs occupying a town both fight to get a freelance gunslinger onto their side. Other subplots are come off as entirely unimportant and are only tools in furthering Miike’s vision of violence and sexual oppression. The aesthetic isn’t much better. Visually, the film is over-exposed and uninspired, trying to gain significance by being overtly avant-garde. The picture seems to try too hard to do all the wrong things while negating everything most deem as being important. This decisively American film, giving a modern day treatment to some rather beloved spaghetti westerns, inadvertently reminds us of the importance of cinematic progression by absolutely trashing what came before it. Cinema, as a whole, needs to take notice of these types of films and never go back to it again.

Distributor: First Look
Cast: Hideaki Ito, Koichi Sato Yusuke Iseya, Yoshino Kimura, Teruyuki Kagawa, Quentin Tarantino and Kaori Momoi
Director: Takashi Miike
Screenwriters: Takashi Miike and Masaru Nakamura
Producers: Masato Osaki and Nobuyuki Tohya
Genre: Action/Western
Rating: R for strong violence, including a rape
Running time: 98 min.

4 Comments

Philosophe_rouge said:

I haven't seen this, but I think this is your best review yet. Woo!

November 18, 2008 2:30 PM

Kent said:

Ouch, that was an efficient butchery. And no mention of the word sloppy either! Anyway, I do find Stanley Kubrick a 'cold' filmmaker, but the question is, is it a bad thing? I don't think 2001 would work with a sense of human warmth, it's simply too sweeping, too large for intimate human connection. So, 'cold' isn't a bad thing at all in Kubrick's case.

I really didn't get much out of Sukiyaki aside from wanton bloodshed, but when someone makes as many films as Miike does in a year, it's not surprising he has some major failures.

I wouldn't call Grindhouse a product of the youtube generation, Planet Terror was nothing more then buisness as usual for Rodriguez, and it showed in the overall quality of that film. Death Proof showed Tarantino trying his hardest to homage everything, and that was a failure.

Either way. Some of your most precise, on the dot writing yet.

November 18, 2008 4:24 PM

Kent said:

Ouch, that was an efficient butchery. And no mention of the word sloppy either! Anyway, I do find Stanley Kubrick a 'cold' filmmaker, but the question is, is it a bad thing? I don't think 2001 would work with a sense of human warmth, it's simply too sweeping, too large for intimate human connection. So, 'cold' isn't a bad thing at all in Kubrick's case.

I really didn't get much out of Sukiyaki aside from wanton bloodshed, but when someone makes as many films as Miike does in a year, it's not surprising he has some major failures.

I wouldn't call Grindhouse a product of the youtube generation, Planet Terror was nothing more then buisness as usual for Rodriguez, and it showed in the overall quality of that film. Death Proof showed Tarantino trying his hardest to homage everything, and that was a failure.

Either way. Some of your most precise, on the dot writing yet.

November 18, 2008 4:25 PM

JoeGalm said:

Philosophe_rouge: Thank you. Hopefully the review is good enough to suade you from seeing it.

Kent: I'm always glad to have an insightful response from someone who has seen the film in question, particularly when it comes to one of the year's lesser seen efforts such as this.

As for Kubrick, I feel the same way as he's my favorite director but Tarantino's comment was meant to be less than complimentary. As I'm sure you'll agree, his coldness is in the vein of his own perfection, a byproduct if you will.

As for Grindhouse (the film, not the movement), I more or less stand by what I said though you pinned Death Proof's problems quite well. Planet Terror is the better film of the two and, ultimately, the better watch but I still don't feel its content works that well in the realm of feature film; I much prefer it in 2-3 minute doses.

Again, thanks for the comments.

November 18, 2008 5:24 PM

Leave a comment