From November 22nd to December 1st 2007, the 14th Rencontres Internationales will create a space of discovery and reflection between new cinema and contemporary art: at theCentre Pompidou, the Jeu de Paume national museum, the Palais de Tokyo, and other key locations.

This year, several foreign cultural institutions take part to the Rencontres Internationales with a specific programme related to the different themes and stakes of the manifestation: the Canadian Cultural Centre, the Goethe Institute, the Cervantes Institute, the Swedish Cultural Institute.

With 150 artists and filmmakers from all over the world, this exceptional edition will propose a programme which is being presented for the first time internationally - film, video, installation, net art, concerts - and which includes many film premieres, a video programme, an exhibition and multimedia concerts. Furthermore, the entire programme can be viewed and reviewed on request in the multimedia library.

This year's programme, which is particularly rich and dense, has been selected out of 6 200 proposals as well as by invitations made to certain artists and filmmakers. This program is the result of an elaborate international search of works of art: 200 works from Germany, France, Spain, and 60 other countries, bringing together internationally-known artists and filmmakers and young artists and filmmakers whose works will be presented for the first time in Paris.

By Emily Monaco

"Utopia Propaganda" Preferred

Lind/Unlink shakily realistic

At the risk of sounding ignorant, the films in the “Utopia Propaganda” screening of the Rencontres Internationales festival were easier to watch than those from “Link/Unlink.” Don’t get me wrong—I love art films, and the films from “Link/Unlink” were poignant and beautiful, but as I sat in the Entrepôt theater once again last night, I was much more drawn to this second round of films.


Paul Rowley and David Phillips’ Commonwealth still lacked a discernable story, but the starkness and symmetry in the images was breathtaking, and the simple cello score drew my attention. It was obviously very digitized: nothing real could be so perfect. I suppose this was the point of the “Utopia” part of the title of the screening, which is what drew me to it in the first place: the idea of a Utopia, of perfection, is an interesting one, especially today when our attention is so drawn to the imperfect parts of our society and our world. Rowley and Phillips used images of starkly perfect trees, birds, and two-toned red and black images within the rest of the film to show this perfection. However it was done, it was mesmerizing.


Mark Boswell’s The St. Petersburg Paradox focused much more on the “Propaganda” aspect of the screening. It almost played like a feature film—because parts of it were. Boswell took sections of familiar movies and even tapings of rock songs to compile his film, with an eerily deep voice narrating and subtitles that reminded me of Woody Allen’s exploration of subtext. It was very political in nature, but I’ve come to expect that of films shown here. While it wasn’t the propaganda aspect that drew me to this screening, Boswell’s film was one of my favorites: drawing attention to propaganda in America has gotten a little bit bland, but Boswell’s new take on propaganda in general was refreshing and new. I think this may be my favorite part of attending an art film festival—the refreshing novelty of it all.


The films of “Link/Unlink” were, for the most part, documentaries, where the filmmaker brought a camera to the setting and began filming whatever he saw. For this, the obvious choice is a hand-held camera, and so a lot of the shots were shaky, which gave the films a lot of raw realism.


The focus of the “Utopia Propaganda” films, however, seemed to be more on the editing and on creating a cohesive piece of film. Whereas the medium for the “Link/Unlink” films tended towards raw footage, the filmmakers of “Utopia Propaganda really took advantage of the editing room, and because of the tightness of the editing, I, as an audience member, concentrated less on the technical aspects of the films, and more on the stories.

Leave a comment