Hancock
posted June 26, 2008 11:29 AM
Hancock proves to be a little too coarse and over-the-top for its own good
Brash, excessive and supremely inelegant, Hancock can be fun if you like that sort of thing. The over-the-top action sequences easily rival the film’s most immediate competition (Wanted), but add a surprising edge—finally we have a black, cinematic superhero and he’s operating in a universe that’s very modern. Though thinly realized, the title character is given some minor emotional development through the use of music, but even played by the reliably good Will Smith, Hancock is not worthy of the heft of its title. Still, box office promises to be huge as the action genre is finally making a stride in directions that could sway more towards niche without losing its wide appeal.
Outside of X-Men's Storm and the ever-broadening cast of TV’s Heroes, minority superheroes haven’t enjoyed tons of discovery. Modern comics are riddled with series that explore the plight of “real world” characters afflicted with superpowers and their attendant consequences (the Hulk can’t socialize or experience intimacy, Daredevil pops pills to subdue the pain of battle wounds), but those real-world characters are frequently cultural majorities, emotionally struggling under soul-sucking bourgeois malaise or numbing mediocrity (see Spider-Man, Wanted). In a unique but soap-opera-inspired turn, what sets Hancock apart from his contemporaries is his amnesia. As a result of his memory loss, he carries himself with a recklessness commonplace among bullies. A good portion of the first act is dedicated to Hancock’s dereliction of duty, his absolute irresponsibility with his powers, which, while it helps out the police, incurs millions of dollars in damages. Still, he’s effective. A comic foil in this period of wanton destruction is found in an 8-year-old bully Michel, who’s French, blonde, a touch portly and picking on the son of Hancock’s PR man Ray (beautifully played by Jason Bateman). Michel’s reckless behavior is easily subdued by Hancock, and then promptly explained by Mary (Charlize Theron): He’s acting out because his parents are divorcing. There’s a similar emotional displacement at hand with Hancock’s recklessness, but in this case, we’ve no one to offer up any trite psychology.
The film’s biggest drawbacks are visual. The premise is pretty high concept and the effects are largely impressive, but the manner in which director Peter Berg invokes energy and tension are all easy and speak to the “klass” of low end TV drama. Jittering handheld camerawork is not only misplaced, it’s overused in places where it’s hardly required at all. On a more foundational note, the script by Vincent Ngo and Vince Gilligan deliberately leaves certain major developments needlessly untended. The identity or origin of Hancock the “man” is a constantly repeated mystery, and instead of using the mystery for cliffhanger-style suspense, it’s bandied about, and once we’re done not caring about it for 90 minutes, the matter’s left unresolved. I’m sure such a mistake could be salvaged or exploited in the service of franchising down the road, but in the face of this and so many other missed opportunities, it’s simply hard to care.
The audience’s lethargy is matched by the film’s laziness. Intensity and purpose are communicated in the film via completely indolent means. When Hancock goes to jail, we’re exposed to the threat of his neighboring convicts with the throwback rap “Colors,” thus eschewing any dramatic onus on the prisoners and tastelessly cashing in on the minority angle. When Mary (Charlize Theron) comes to see Hancock for “business,” she’s changed from her regular uniform of gauzy nudes to black. Berg didn’t think it overt enough to let the actress’ posture connote import, no; he had the makeup artist spackle her with black eyeliner. Don’t get me wrong; the makeup looks great, but how absurd! For the first two acts, she’s miss granola LA, but when she takes on important tasks she goes dark?
I’m not so sure Berg is losing faith that his audience can follow along—the film is intended for a broad base and did get a surprising PG-13—but in the face of so many comic book films entering theatres, it seems a poor choice to differentiate yours by way of tacky TV-level antics.
Distributor: Sony
Cast: Will Smith, Jason Bateman, Charlize Theron and Jae Head
Director: Peter Berg
Screenwriters: Vincent Ngo and Vince Gilligan
Producers: Akiva Goldsman, James Lasseter, Michael Mann and Will Smith
Genre: Action
Rating: PG-13 for some intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence, and language
Running time: 92 min.
Release date: July 2
13 Comments
Leave a comment


mel said:
the movie was freaken good. Lots of action, lots of humor and an amazing cast. Two thumbs up for me.
July 3, 2008 4:48 AM
Mike Mayberry, LaVergne TN said:
GREAT MOVIE, Starts funny, then gets exciting, then a bit tear jerking, and ends with wanting more. I cant wait for the sequel. 4 - STARS
July 5, 2008 11:41 PM
Stan said:
I love this movie, 5 stars for me, great story line,the action was just enough and not over bearing like most superhero movies,great job Will.
July 7, 2008 5:38 AM
J-La said:
Critic Sarah Schieron didn't think that this was a good film. I'm going to see it based on Stan and Mike's comment. I hope their right!
July 7, 2008 2:35 PM
Mitchell Vasallo said:
This was a great movie. I just hope this doesn't become a franchise movie. Sure the first one is successful. But to continue with this story is not worth building sequels for. Let's just hope they keep it at one.
July 9, 2008 7:52 AM
Craig said:
Probably one of the worst storylines of all time, but played fairly well by Smith, and exceptionally well by Bateman. Poor ending, unintellectual and occasionally boring, the movie does have enough humour to keep you in your seat. Probably a C minus.
July 9, 2008 9:04 PM
حمدي said:
الفيلم جااااااااااااامد طحن
July 10, 2008 11:17 AM
Reel Fan Review said:
Will Smith was great, funny. The movie was pretty entertaining.The overall acting and directing was good. But that is it!!
Except for a few "bad" words, your 12 or 13 years old kid will probably enjoy it more than you do. The plot, if there is one, was too weak and did not make too much sense.
If it's for the kids, go see it. If it is for you, unless you are in a very good and "open to anything" mood or bored, wait for the dvd to rent!
I give it a '3 and 1/2 FANS' because of the special effects.
July 16, 2008 6:42 PM
no1 said:
to craig
get a life why you hate all sucessful men and actors you only jealous and story line was very nice
you are an ass that`s all
August 8, 2008 12:02 AM
mohsen said:
hancock is very pretty movie but i think i seen like that before
August 25, 2008 2:17 AM
rafik maroc nador said:
hancock is my best movie in this year and smith is the best 4ever good job will
September 12, 2008 10:30 AM
Amanda said:
it was an awesome movie one of the best action movie out there even though ive only got to see it 2 time ive already remember the whole movie that hoe awesome that movie is well will smith is and really fantasic actor and theres no movie that can replace this one
September 19, 2008 2:26 PM
Amanda said:
it was an awesome movie one of the best action movie out there even though ive only got to see it 2 time ive already remember the whole movie awesome. will smith is a really fantasic actor and theres no movie that can replace this one
September 19, 2008 2:27 PM