Twilight
posted November 19, 2008 4:08 PM
Only fans of the book will truly enjoy this vampire flick
Fans of the bestselling novel Twilight are no doubt ecstatic to greet the celluloid incarnation of the vampire love story this weekend at the box office. It’s a modern day “Romeo and Juliet” tale between a reclusive female mortal, a mysterious male vampire and all the chaotic family drama in between. Female fans have been dying to see this forbidden love story for months and have already made a mark buying advance tickets to midnight and opening weekend shows. Everyone else unassociated with the source material will be left scratching their head wondering what all the fuss is about, resulting in a strong opening weekend but not much repeat business beyond that.
Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) is introduced as a precocious teenager relocating from Phoenix, Arizona to her father’s small town of Forks, Washington. Like most kids adapting to a new environment, she’s skeptical and shy while masking those feelings with a tough exterior. Most of the school seems to be friendly to this new outsider except for Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson), a mysterious loner who has been investigating recent deaths in the town and also has other plans for our young heroine. It turns out Edward is a huge question mark to students and teachers alike. Little is known about him; he disappears with his family whenever there’s sunlight and his skin is always ice cold. Adding insult to injury, Edward and everyone in his family are to the point of looking inhumanly pale and agitated whenever the town murders are mentioned—a huge red flag to anyone with half a brain. Then again logic doesn’t seem to apply in Twilightland which explains why no one seems to notice that the Cullen clan aren’t just in need of a serious tan but instead are a family of vampires.
Twilight takes us through the motions of putting Bella and Edward together only to realize that putting them together is the worst idea possible. Even after confessing that all he wants is to drain her blood dry, Bella literally shrugs off Edward’s homicidal confession and falls in love with him anyway. Maybe she’s just bored and looking for excitement or maybe the filmmakers didn’t think the tween audience would notice such an idiotic development.
Speaking of Twilight’s construction, the result of its blandness is the product of its two bland leads Stewart and Pattinson. Stewart, in particular, delivers her lines as if simultaneously confused and half asleep. At least Pattinson gives emoting a shot but in the end he doesn’t fare much better either. As for director Catherine Hardwicke
how the mighty have fallen. After showing such promise with indie staples Thirteen and Lords of Dogtown she’s fallen on contrivance here. Shooting action scenes from obscure angles and relying too much on bad dialogue and even worse CGI. There’s a baseball scene two-thirds into the movie that is the perfect blend of awful. A confrontation takes place between two opposing sets of vampires and they each sound like a high school theatre yet when they strike at each other their movements look like weak holograms. Despite its clumsy and contrived nature Twilight is an innocuous mess that will be embraced by fans but confuse everyone else.
Distributor: Summit Entertainment
Cast: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Billy Burke, Peter Facinelli and Cam Gigandet
Director: Catherine Hardwicke
Screenwriter: Melissa Rosenberg
Producers: Wyck Godfrey, Greg Mooradian, Mark Morgan and Karen Rosenfelt
Genre: Drama
Rating: PG-13 for some violence and a scene of sensuality.
Running time: 120 minutes
Release date: November 21, 2008
111 Comments
Leave a comment





joseph said:
this will be a great movie. Forget about the review.
November 19, 2008 7:46 PM
zyzy said:
thats'a a great story...
November 19, 2008 7:58 PM
Kayla said:
I love the book and i think the movie will be amazing as well. I think they are both great actors and all the fans of Twilight will love this movie.
November 19, 2008 8:48 PM
Kim said:
I think having read the book (with lots of cheesy old saying by both Bella and Edward), the movie will come off just as cheesy. But for devout fans, that won't be a problem, because they have read the book. The preview alone makes it look bad! And I did read the book and liked it, I just don't think the movie will be that good. So, come in with low expectation and hope to get blown away and not vice-versa.
November 20, 2008 11:21 AM
taylor said:
This review is spot on. For everyone who's read the books this is just more of the same and therefore, something to look forward to, but for everyone else it's just a steaming pile of crap, sorry.
November 20, 2008 12:16 PM
Nicola said:
To be honest.
I can't wait for the movie and if predictions of overall takings of $150 million worldwide don't tell you that its going to be good then I don't know what will.
Certainly not this oafish review.
November 20, 2008 2:50 PM
Louise said:
Big box office numbers don't mean a movie is good, just popular. And no, they are not the same thing.
I fully expect this will do well at the box office. And, I'm just as sure that it's pure, unadulterated crap.
Just like the books.
November 20, 2008 4:36 PM
YUIOP said:
No, this movie will suck just like the books.
I agree with Louise.
November 20, 2008 6:16 PM
Puss N' Boots said:
I completely agree with the review. It's quite obvious in the trailer that Kristen Stewart delivers her lines like she's dull and seemed to be narcoleptic. The tone of her voice sounds lower to Pattinson's which makes his voice more dulcet than hers. Pattinson on the otherhand is trying hard to be serious that he looks constipated in every angle. Box-office wise it be a phenomenon with the teens and will be completely ignored by those who will barf on its cheesy dialogues.
November 20, 2008 7:53 PM
Courteney said:
OK...I went to see the midnight showing of this last night, and I didn't goin with high expectations. I didn't know if they could actually make it anywhere close to the books, considering the time they put into it and how long it was going to be. However, with that said, I think the movie was awsome. This review is obviously written by someone who has no respect for anyone else's opinion and is just out to make the movie sound bad so that no one besides "teen obsessed fans" will go see it. Let me tell you that there was just as many adults in that theater as there were teens. The movie was awsome and I can't wait for the next movie to be made
November 21, 2008 6:11 AM
tina said:
I am a mom of 3 I have read all 4 books and I saw the movie at midnight I went in just like i was going to a h potter movie not expecting to see every little detail and I LOVE IT with the book you laugh cry jump forjoy and shreik and I did all the above with the movie maybe not at the same parts but with a book its you heart making the words come to life no one but you can duplicate that Now with that said GO SEE THIS MOVIE you will love it I am going 2 more times with friends and then with my husband
November 21, 2008 8:07 AM
Leigha said:
First off, the publishing industry is a harsh world. If Stephenie Meyer's books wouldnt be good enough to publish, then they wouldnt have been accepted. If your book sucks it doesnt get published. They only publish books that they know will be succesful. So obviously they knew Twilight would be a big hit! Second everyone forgets that bella in the book is only 17. she acts like a normal high school teens. of course she's " self centered" at some points. She hasnt even matured yet shes a teen. Of course if edward were real we would all be selfish and want him for ourselves anyways. No book is perfect, it has it's flaws. No movie is perfect, it has its flaws. The point is, that either you like Twilight or you don't. Its an amazing famous popular book, thats fanbase is still rapidly growing. Everyday at school I see more and more copies of Twilight?? why, because it's good. I've gotten valley girls, people who've never even picked up a book, teachers, and guys to read the books. In three months, i had 78 people read twilight! so obviously its a good book. Besides, if Stephenie made Bella an extremely gorgeous person, it would be another cliche love story, just like every other one. But she made Twilight unique,relatable, understandable, and highly entertaining. Yes it sounds like a chick book!! because it is!! it was Written by a women for women. and if men read it,,, that shows how good it is. Men could learn some important things from Twilight!! Critics rate movies that will do good, bad, because they know it will be a big hit and have alot of publicity. Movies like Beowulf, were rated A plus, which i know for a fact, no one liked. They also hated I am Legend, which had its flaws but was a good movie. Critics opinions dont matter. They are paid to rate movies bad and say how crappy or ****ty they think it is. Thats what a critic does, they are harsh people. They're opinion doesnt matter, ours does. And from what i've heard, Twilight is amazing, and that its expected to take a bite out of box office bucks, so i dont know what anyone is talking about when they say it's going to suck. Yeah Twilight was shot with a low buget, because summitt Entertainment isnt a popular movie company. But Twilight is expected to change that, and hopefully the following Twilight series. So cry me a river people!!
November 21, 2008 8:14 AM
mom of 3 said:
thank you Leigha I thought I was the only one thinking that way I loved it last night and I will see it again and I hope that it continues in to the next movies to I have also gotten so many people to read the books as well as my husband to listen to the audiobooks at work Is nice to know others feel the same way
November 21, 2008 8:31 AM
butterfly said:
The movie was okay of course the book was so much better but everyone knows that. It was hard for be because I kept comparing the book to the movie and I feel that was a big mistake so do not compare because you may be disappointed
November 21, 2008 8:34 AM
Brandie said:
The only reason the reviews are bad is because the movie isn't all that great actually. I saw it last night for the opening and I was syked about it because I've read the whole series.. but the movie definitely doesn't do the story justice. It's also because it was an under budgeted film. I think Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson are the perfect characters for the job because they have so much chemistry together but maybe the dialogue wasn't the greatest. You have to understand the movie was made mainly for the Twilight readers because if you didn't know anything about the movie and just walked in, you definitely would not catch all the little things. You probably wouldn't understand the movie at all.
November 21, 2008 8:55 AM
angel said:
ders only 1 fing 2 say...........TWILIGHT ROCKS
November 21, 2008 9:03 AM
Tammy said:
I loved the Twilight book series and I loved the movie... I can't wait to see the 2nd one... I was very excited to take my kids to the midnight show last night and none of us were disappointed... We just bought the 4 books when the 4th one came out in July and it amazes me how many hands our books have passed through... me and my daughters several of their friends... WOW... that is all I can say... WOW
November 21, 2008 9:39 AM
Tsubomi said:
My boyfriend and I saw the movie last night. I've read all the books and he hasn't. When it was over I liked it, and so did he! He was actually surprised because he had been dreading it and didn't really want to see it (in fact if my mother had visited he would have sent us off to see it and gone and done something else). But now he's curious about the world of Twilight and has asked me a bunch of questions regarding things that are addressed in future books but brought up in Twilight. So honestly, if it has the ability to bring up interest in someone who had no interest and felt they wouldn't, then it can't be that bad.
:P Though one thing we both agreed on, the special effects were cheesy. But cheesy special effects shouldn't be focused on, otherwise you spoil everything else there is for you to see.
November 21, 2008 11:14 AM
Brandie said:
yes. i do think they could have done a better job with the running parts. it did look very cheesy. i guess they weren't really trying to focus on that and more of just bella and edward.
still nonetheless, i feel as if it didn't do the story justice. i feel like the i was expecting more. maybe its just me, i mean i still love the movie. and i love the series more. i'm just as much as a twilight freak then the next.. but i was let-down by the movie. i had higher expectations i guess.
November 21, 2008 11:28 AM
Grecia said:
The movies are never as good as the books but everyone needs to chill. I LOVE Twilight. Simple as that, i dont care if the movie sucks
November 21, 2008 2:37 PM
alissa said:
ok first I dont care what they say I loved it I just saw it today and read the books and it was the best. These people probably never read the books so they dont get it. It was really good acting and theyre not being fake. The director did an awsome job. This is the best movie ever.
November 21, 2008 3:22 PM
LL said:
Do not look at this review!!!
I have already seen the movie and it is in my top 3 favorite movies of all time. Don't listen to the people who tell you that it is not worth it. It is a great movie and you should go see it.
November 21, 2008 4:54 PM
Margie said:
All the review's seem to have been done by old guys who don't know what they are talking about. This is because you HAVE to read the books!!! Then you'll understand why it's going to be an Incredible movie to fans whether it is a good film or not.
November 21, 2008 5:56 PM
teresa said:
the movie was great.. obviously cant compare it to the books but considering it was low budget it did really good
November 21, 2008 7:52 PM
Jodie said:
that was one of the best movie ive ever seen
November 21, 2008 8:56 PM
vanessa said:
it's a great movie but you need to read the book first... THEN you can review it.
November 21, 2008 9:41 PM
YES. said:
The movies never compare to the books, but really, can you do better?
For the people who say 'Twilight sucks', I hope you've already read the book, and not just judging it.
This review is a bit harsh on the movie, but it does give a few spot-on truths. Regardless, I would still watch it, no matter the review, and decide for myself. So just got watch it =)
Ps. Read the book, first.
November 21, 2008 10:48 PM
Amy said:
Everyone needs to realize that this movie was prolly low-budget and they worked with what they could. In the future, the other movies will get better, and not be quite so cheesy. I loved it though!
November 21, 2008 11:32 PM
Angelica said:
I have seen the movie and shes right about it appealing to the teenagers only but I dont agree with Robs acting if she read the books she wouldnt get it either. Edward is supposed to hate himself not just go-cry-about-it hate but try killing yourself and be miserable even when in love hate, and it shows in the movie. I think he did the best job on sticking to his character besides the comedic relief through out by the other actors which was great. Rob was the only link to the true Twilight I feel and a for Kristen she did as good as she could with what was given.
November 21, 2008 11:40 PM
parent & teacher (over 45 age group) said:
LIKED IT ALOT!!!!!
I really liked both the book and the movie. Paranormal is one of, if not the top, sellers in romatic fiction today. Twilight is a modern day "Romeo & Juliet" story! Full of forbidden love that has been made trendy and fresh, with the paranormal twist. Sure the book, and the movie, have cheesy parts. But frankly, I like it all the more because of this.
As to the camera action: I liked the baseball sceen, it was very "Matrix" but with action other than violence. I liked it!
The sceen where Bella and Edward are lying in the forest is one or the most romantic I have ever seen, very moving and touching! Then they did the airal view and it distracted from the moment, really unnecessary.
Overall, I really approved of the minimal violance, there was some, with little blood and gore, but not much for a 2 hour movie. It was refreshing not to be grossed out at the theater!
Finally, I really thought it was a wonderful teenage romance. I like that they abstain from sex in the movie yet the kissing and touching is erotic, but appropriate for teens both to see and do!
LIKED IT ALOT!!!!!
November 22, 2008 5:51 AM
mom of 2 said:
This movie was incredible!! I have read all four books and I am looking forward to the next three movies! If you have read the book, you will know that the acting of all characters was right on!! Go see this movie, read the book and then go see it again!!!
November 22, 2008 6:07 AM
Jess said:
I've read all the books, and after viewing the previews i wasn't overly thrilled to see the movie. Being a fan, however, i saw it the day it came out. Although it has awkward moments and poor CGI, I am SO happy with the way the movie turned out. I wasn't in the least bit disappointed in the transition from book to movie and I can't wait to see the next one!
November 22, 2008 6:11 AM
bald_nozzle said:
I saw Twilight last night when it opened. My wife has already read all four(4) books. I am 42 years old and I really enjoyed the movie. We did, however, make one mistake - seeing it on opening night and sitting in the theatre with a bunch of lovestruck 'Edward' teenagers, cooing and awing at every sight of him. Every scene that showed a kiss or the possibility of a kiss, or a close up of Edward, ignited some type of open-mouth reaction from the teenage girls in the audience. Other than that, I have no complaints about the movie. I am eagerly looking forward to the sequel. You have to remember, reviews are only people's opinions. Don't ever NOT go to a movie based on what reviews you read. Go check it out for yourself and give it a chance.
November 22, 2008 6:24 AM
male over thirty said:
I have not read the books and really liked the movie. Go see this movie and form your own opinion. You do'nt have to read the books to enjoy it.
November 22, 2008 7:08 AM
brandy said:
im a fan of the books..! obsessed is more like it. and i couldnt wait for the movie..but i knew that it wouldnt even come close to how AMAZING the books are..and i went into the movie excited but a bit worried that i might be too excited and then i would end up hating the movie cause my expectations were too high...i was wrong..although the movie changes some scenes and it seemed to me that it was going a little fast..i absolutely loved it..of course its nothing compared to the book..but its still probably like my favorite movie EVER!!! and as for the whole unless you read the books youll be confused and not interested...i went with a friend whose never even heard of twilight till last month and she hasnt read the books and she absolutely loved the movie! she said it was amazing and that at some parts she was just blown away from it..!!! not everyone will love this movie..and im not going to judge those that dont. but if you think that the books and movie are stupid and a waste of time..well obviously you havnt read the books to know how amazing they are,,and if you dont like the movie or book dont come onto these pages and say how much you dont like it..ps LOVED THE MOVIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 22, 2008 8:06 AM
Tiffney said:
Look if you do not like twilight then just don't comment at all. All you are doing is making the reviews bad. After all it is just a waist of time for you. We(twilight fans) really love the books.
So this is a great time for us to be able to see it in a movie. I saw the 12:00 a.m show and I loved the movie even though things were left out it was over all great. I'm hoping to see a "New Moon" movie out soon.
November 22, 2008 1:25 PM
Sabrina said:
I love this movie!! Go See it. I will see it at least 20 more times, LOL!! I've read the book 100 times or more. ;)
November 22, 2008 4:46 PM
Crystal said:
I went into the theater with mixed view points on what the movie would be like. Let me tell you this, it turned out to be the most incredible experience! I was not expecting it to be so good. I actually went with about 14 friends, some had not even read the books and they loved it as well. Some of the elderly critics said that the effects were not that great so I was expecting them to be corny...they weren't at all. They also said the meadow scene was lacking, but I thought it was absolutely amazing! I watched in astonishment as my favorite book was brought to life on the big screen and the only thing I want is more!! The acting was incredible...you could actually feel Edwards torment in Rob's emotions. Kristen was a fantastic Bella, perfect in every way. I feel so lucky to have been able to see this movie and I will see it over and over again! Twilight has become a household name and this movie just reinforces all the hype!!!
November 22, 2008 5:00 PM
XD said:
Haha, what you said was totally true. XD The book is good, and the movie is too -- but just for laughs. XD I felt numb when it ended, like "Wait what? Is that it? ...Well, ok. At least they made us laugh."
November 22, 2008 5:13 PM
I have not read the book and I like the movie! said:
I saw the movie and I havent read the book ..and I really like it! I think the story itself is really interesting and rare.. and I loved the camera angles and the stunts
The cast is amazing, and I love "bella", which I believe is Kristen Stewart. I have seen her in other movies like :
Into the wild/Speak/the messengers
And I think she is an amazing young actress. There are NO boring scenes!!
You are being a jerk, Cerritos and I dont think "Vampire ´Sets´" exists at all. I am a huge vampires fan (not the twilight ones, because again I have not read the book) but one thing Im sure of is that there are no sets of vampires you ignorant!
November 22, 2008 5:21 PM
Jaycee said:
Frankly, I only read the title and the last sentence of this article.
I am a fan of Twilight and have read all four of Stephenie Meyer's books for this series. I also got the chance to watch the movie today, and totally loved it!
The beginning was not very eye-catching to me, but as the movie progressed, it grew better and better.
However, I don't think that this movie is suited only for those who have read the book.. perhaps to understand the beginning of the movie better, but even the movie didn't even require one to read the book to grasp a sense of what was going on because Bella (the narrator) did a great job introducing the story.
Sure, there are bits of details here and there that would excite the readers of Twilight more than, perhaps, someone who didn't read the book.. however, the majority of the main points and features were explained by the dialogue in the movie!
I just think the action, love, and conflicts stood out very well on its own two feet, so that even people who haven't read the book Twilight will enjoy the movie!
As a last note, the last time I read the book Twilight, I believe, was two years ago, so I don't remember a lot of the details. However, I still LOVED the movie today!! Some things in the movie also has to be explained on its own--things that even people who have read the book may not have grasped had it not been for the explanations in the movie--because, of course, scenes that could not be added to the movie due to the time-length.
That's why, I recommend the movie to everybody--no matter if you read the book or not. The movie does follow the book quite well, however, the movie can also stand on its own two feet.
November 22, 2008 6:38 PM
big L loves it said:
Great movie. People who says this movie sucks is retarded.
November 22, 2008 6:59 PM
Robin said:
OK !! lets Be real !! I am 36 and read all 4 books i LOVED the books and hope for more !! BUT the MOVIE was badly made !! there were many things they could have done diffrently some things they didnt even address such as james knew alice!! they should have made her feel a little more and they could have talked more like wien he insisted on meeting bellas dad !! i didnt like the whole dinner scene at the culens house STUPID!!!! BUT BUT BUT !!! I am hoping they make the next movie and its even better and lets just hope when they get to the last book its great because thats the best book by far !!!
November 22, 2008 8:20 PM
Michelle said:
I've had my douts about the movie, and went into the movie with a low expectation, but I came out with a sore face from smiling through the movie and thinking it was definately worth waiting in the cold outside the theater for an hour and a half. The movie was amazing, and ALMOST as good as the book. But one thing to remember is, yes, don't watch the movie with high expectation, and second, let your douts about the actors they chose go, and give the movie a chance! I didn't have any doubts! I'm with Robert all the way! He was born to play Edward!
November 22, 2008 11:00 PM
Kirstin said:
I loved the Cullens in the movie and I wish we could have seen more of them as they were really the best part of the movie. Jacob Black (Taylor) and Charlie were also great to watch on screen. I compleetly agree about the lackluster acting from the two leads though. As much as I love Rob Pattinson he tended to overact some of the scenes. As for Kristin Stewart I was not impressed at all. I know Bella is supposed to be an awkard girl and clumsy, but Stewart’s portrayl was just horrible. As for the two together I felt no on screen chemistry. There were only two scenes through out the entire movie I felt anything between them, the rest were just uncomfortable. I don’t know if the movie will get any better with a second viewing, but it was nowhere near as good as the book. Summit just announced the green light for the sequal New Moon and I can only hope that after seeing the first film the actors will be ready to pick it up and meet the standards fans are expecting.
November 22, 2008 11:52 PM
Andrew said:
The books were amazingly brilliant! However, the movie was quite awkward, and lacked the spirit in which made the books terrific! It was unfortunate to be disappointed because I was looking forward to the film to see if they captured Twilight on camera....the big screen, and sad to say, the answer is NO! I'm sorry, the little details that made the story great were overlooked on screen. No justice served....Stephenie Meyer should have had more of a voice during production
November 23, 2008 2:01 AM
Lena Marie said:
Movies never portray the books to an exact science. We all knew that before going into this. My only complaints about the movie were that I didnt feel LOVE radiating from Edward & Bella as stronly as I did in the book. It was really sudden and kinda awkward. And the sparkling in the sun...couldve been a LOT better! Otherwise, THANK YOU STEPHENIE MEYER AND CATHERINE HARDWICKE! Looking forward the next : New Moon!
November 23, 2008 5:41 AM
Jackie said:
Kristen Stewart suck as an actress. Who can't see this? She needs to stop being so proud and take some acting lessons and in a hurry. Also a different director needs to take over the next film if they decide to do another one.
November 23, 2008 9:05 AM
Sophia said:
Twilight should not get two stars. If it was really such a "bad" movie it wouldn't be the NUMBER ONE movie in America. It also wouldn't be making 35 million dollars a day. Twilight is very different from any other vampire movies. Very different. Twilight is funny, scary, and great! I've seen it three times already and it never gets old. Robert Pattinson (and the rest of the cast) were GREAT! I can't wait for New Moon to come out. The books are great and so is the movie. I Give it 5 of 5 stars, 6 if I could.
November 23, 2008 9:44 AM
Sara said:
Its true that the CGI effects were bad and that Kristen was a weird bella but a bella nonetheless. I dragged my friend who had never even heard of Twilight and she loved it even though she admited the effects were bad. Robert was a good Edward and yes they should have showed that Alice knew James. I think the CGI was the ONLY thing I was dissapointed with but I loved the movie as much as I love the books and cant wait for them to make more. Dont blame Catherine Harwicke its not her fault they barely had any money for better effects. And DONT dare compare Twilight to the HP thats coming out next year, THINK about it people compare it to the FIRST HP. Oh please "Marco Cerritos" you only wrote this cause Twilights doing so good but I admit that its true that most of the "money" will be cause of Twilight fans.
November 23, 2008 9:49 AM
Chelsea said:
I love these people who think that because a movie does well or is number one that automatically means it is good. There are tons of bad movies that are #1 because they are box office draws. Popular never automatically means good. It just means popular.
November 23, 2008 1:30 PM
anna said:
i just wanna say that the critics really dont know what they are talking about. they most likely havent read the books and theyre mostly older people. they really need to think in the perspective of the audience that the movie is attracting and then they can give the review. the movie is amazing as are the books! 5 out of 5 stars! and thanks to everyone on here who agrees with me. Ive seen the movie twice already and it was unforgetable. The cast is amazing! cant wait for the next movie!
November 23, 2008 2:18 PM
CryStal said:
i thought this movie was great and well worth seeing again. Then again i was one of the first huge Twilight fans first picking up the book in 2006. My friends and I waited the 17 months since the movie was first announced[we were in the room when she announced it] and are VERY pleased by the outcome!!!
THIS MOVIE IS AMAZING!
FORGET THE REVIEW!
November 23, 2008 3:32 PM
alexis said:
i went to the midnight showing of twlight.. and i will be going to see it again tomorrow.
i ABSOLTELY loved this movie and the twilight books.. i have read all four of them and i cannot wait for the rest to come out on video. the critics were a little too harsh. although i know what they mean about not putting the movie together very well. for someone who has not read the books it might be a little hard to understand. but i think that it was very enjoyable.. i LOVED rob as edward. he played his part perfectly.. but kristen still has a little work to do.. especially in the hospital scene.. idk what that was. hahaha but i think that everyone should GO SEE THE MOVIE.. but read the book first .. it will only make it a better experience!!!!
November 23, 2008 5:50 PM
brandy said:
Iv read all the books and went to the midnight showing. I knew when I went to it that it would be bit different than the book and I was fine with that! I was into bella and Edward. THE MOVIE WAS GREAT! I WENT AGAIN SAT NIGHT BY MY SELF..1. Iv never been to any movie twice. 2. Iv never been to a movie alone...I did both with this movie. Keep your mind open and dont be mad that is not JUST like the book. If your in to the love and story ling you will love this movie. I know the 2nd movie will be better...they will have more time and money.
GO SEE THIS MOVIE. dont worry about all the neg reviews, its either man or ppl who wanted to it be just like the book..with no cuts. GO SEE THE MOVIE...NOW! if you need someone to go with I'll go again!
November 23, 2008 6:48 PM
Kelsey said:
This movie was amazing. I loved it so much. I saw it opening day and i went and saw it again today. This review rips apart the actors and it makes them seem like they were horrible, but they wernt. They played the roles perfectly. Forget the review! I cant wait till the next movie comes out.
November 23, 2008 6:57 PM
McMunkee said:
I tried watching this movie after I tried desperately to read the book. It is possibly the most ridiculously gay attempt to make vampires seem like there might be a good one somewhere out there. But that's not what it did for me, what it did was make me think about how desperate people are for another Romeo and Juliet story that they decided to deface one the most horrifying creatures in all of literature. I can't believe the people that I saw with "Twilight" shirts on at my school. It made me want to try and resurrect Prince Vlad himself so they know what it really is to be blood-thirsty.
Besides any of that, the mere idea that vampires are trying to control their instincts pissed me off. The whole fear behind vampires isn't the fact that they captivate people and make them do whatever the hell they want, or even that they drink blood. The fear behind them was that they were entirely instinct based EXCEPT Dracula. He could control it, but he was, according to the real Dracula story, the most vicious of them all because he could control it.
This movie and book might have been good, IF and ONLY IF the idea of vampires was never thought of before. You can't take maliciously volatile creatures and make them romantic. Vampires can be seductive, that's all well and good, but if they don't end up drinking your blood, killing you, or turning you into their pet, the vampire has to be dead.
Honestly, this movie and book made me wonder if the next big romance based on a pure evil monster going to be ****ing zombies.
November 23, 2008 8:50 PM
suri22 said:
i think its a great movie, it may have some unreal scenes but isnt that what a movie is about, fantasy and the impossible being possible! i loved the whole story... movie and book .... and cant wait for the next! so what if bella goes against logic and falls in love with edward! its a movie!! and beautiful example of the power of true love and imagination!
November 24, 2008 7:17 AM
sbohac1 said:
This is a great movie, and if its only because it actually goes along with the book than so be. They kept vidal lines and scenes from the book that would have angered the fans if they werent on point. IF it confused anyone else, sorry but, this film was made for its fans and the fans loved it!! They did an excellent job and I wish it would have ran three hours long! This Review makes me sad for the person writing it. This movie is finally something different, I wish everyone could enjoy and celebrate this amazing story that stephanie meyer wrote. It truly is an epic love story with a sweet wicked twist. The next three books only get better and Im sure the haters will really hate, when they see warewolfes running around competing for bellas attention!! SO LOVE IT OR HATE IT BUT THE TWILIGHT SAGA IS HERE O STAY!!!!!!!!!
November 24, 2008 8:26 AM
rose said:
Twilight is and it's movie are amazing.
Twilight is best movie ever i love it.
i am a big fan of Twilight.
i love it !
Twilight!
Twilight!
1 am a big fan of Twilight!
November 24, 2008 4:59 PM
rose said:
Twilight is and it's movie are amazing.
Twilight is best movie ever i love it.
i am a big fan of Twilight.
i love it !
Twilight!
Twilight!
1 am a big fan of Twilight!
November 24, 2008 5:00 PM
rose said:
Twilight book and it's movie are amazing.
Twilight is best movie ever i love it.
i am a big fan of Twilight.
i love it !
Twilight!
Twilight!
1 am a big fan of Twilight!
November 24, 2008 5:01 PM
Ashley said:
I have read only the first book and i loved it. People that i have talked to before i went to see the movie the day it came out said that the movie sucked and it was nothing compared to the book.when they make movies about a book it is not going to be like that book and everybody was disappointed because of that but i loved it and i hope that they make a second movie.
November 24, 2008 6:50 PM
Thespian_LV said:
The Twilight movie was not what is was all hyped to be. As neither, in my humble teen opinion, are the books. Robert Pattinson seemed to be having a really bad seizure in the first Biology scene--really bad acting!--I wondered why that scene was not redone. The directing was not as strong as it could've been; the special effects were crappy; and the acting was not 100% there. I know that if I were to pull an "Edward-in-Biology-class" face at my mentor, she'd slap me across the face and ask, "Why are you acting?" The movie is not so great as to go watch it more than once, but is not a big regret for your money.
November 25, 2008 12:42 AM
Thespian_LV said:
The Twilight movie was not what is was all hyped to be. As neither, in my humble teen opinion, are the books. Robert Pattinson seemed to be having a really bad seizure in the first Biology scene--really bad acting!--I wondered why that scene was not redone. The directing was not as strong as it could've been; the special effects were crappy; and the acting was not 100% there. I know that if I were to pull an "Edward-in-Biology-class" face at my mentor, she'd slap me across the face and ask, "Why are you acting?" The movie is not so great as to go watch it more than once, but is not a big regret for your money.
November 25, 2008 12:42 AM
Wongsawatra said:
i will watch this movie in my country 555+
November 25, 2008 4:40 AM
Reema_Malik said:
umm...who decides what cheesy??... really... who does??.. because if this is cheesy...then its perfect too.. i loved the movie and the story and maybe we need some cheesy stuff like this... cuz i loved it..
November 25, 2008 9:21 AM
Bitten said:
I had low expectations when I went to see the movie. I'm a huge fan of the Twilight saga and knew it couldn't be as good as the books. It wasn't, but it was still a great movie. It remains true to the book with some funny extras. The chemistry between Edward and Bella sizzled and I definitely look forward to seeing more of Victoria. I think Catherine Hardwicke did a wonderful job, as did the entire cast, with the budget and time they had. I've seen this movie 4 times so far and plan to see it more.
November 25, 2008 11:13 AM
Lacey said:
There is always something that gets left out when you turn a book into a movie. You dont get to know the characters or situations as well through a movie the way you do with a book. In movies, thoughts and feelings are left to the imagination unlike when you read a book, your inside the hero/heroines mind. You know how they feel and thier internal struggles and you feel like you know them as a person other than just some character. The book will always be better.
That being said, I think Summit ent. did a good job with the casting and filming of Twilight. The movie followed the book very closely and even though a few things were somewhat different than the book, it didnt take away from the story line. If you've read all the books you understand that the first book of twilight is like a foundation for the rest of the story. The one thing I think they could have done better was on Edwards behalf. You dont hear the thoughts around him like you read in the book. Through Edwards thoughts in the book you understand people like Jessica and Mike better. You also see Alice's visions through Edwards thoughts and with those missing from the movie I think people who hadnt read the book would understand the story better with them. Hopefully they will change that in the rest of the movies.
Robert Pattinson did a remarkable job as Edward. I think he really portrayed the sexy broading vampire really well. You can see the struggle of forbidden love in his eyes and through his acting. He got two thumbs up for me.
Kristin Stewart as Bella was a good choice. She is unconventionally pretty and really brings Bella's Character to life. She was absolutely perfect and I really dont think anyone BUT Robert Pattinson and Kristin Stwart could have played those characters.
The rest of the Cullen Clan was perfect too. Everyone played thier part very well. It was like seeing my imagination come to life for everyone else to see. Emmett and Jasper are hotties.
The best thing about the movie that was unexpected for me was the comedy angle. There were some very funny parts in that movie!
All in all even through I definitely think the book was better, I still feel like the movie was done very well and I already cant wait to see it again.
To the critic responsible for the review. Unless you have read the books, all of them, you shouldnt be reviewing the story at all. Your opinion really doesnt matter anyway because everyone likes different things and usually when any critic gives a bad review, I almost always like whatever they didnt and everything they do like I hate. So it looks like this review only gets one star. Sorry.
November 25, 2008 3:20 PM
Lacey said:
TO MCMONKEE:
1. Dracula was not nor has he ever been REAL! Vampire stories, legends and lore, all of it comes from the imagination. Therefore there is no right or wrong way to create a blood thirsty vampire.
2. Apparently you've never seen "My Boyfriends Back" *whispers* FYI - they already did a zombie love story so your too late on that one! LOL hope that doesnt twist your panties.
November 25, 2008 3:29 PM
Lacey said:
The reason the CGI and effects werent so up to par was because this was a B-Budget film that made a A-Budget profit. the more money they make off the movies the better the rest will get. they did the best the could with what they had and hats off to them for it. i didnt think the effects were really that bad in the first place.
November 25, 2008 3:34 PM
cherry said:
Twilight is so awesome.
i love it.
ecpecially a big fan of Edward Cullen. he is so awesome and a big fan of Bella Swan. she is also awesome.
it is a great story.
i love it!
i love it!
Twilight is so awesome.
i am a big fan of Twilight.
the story is so cool and different!
Twilight!
Twilight!
i really like Twilight so much.
November 25, 2008 4:19 PM
sally said:
umm! Twilight is a great story it is very different from others.
i think the one who read the book will not really enjoy the movie that much because the book have more details.
i think the one who haven't read the book will realy enjoy the movie.
i like both the movie and the book although book have more details than the movie but i like both movie and the book.
i really really like Twilight very much.
i love it.
i like Twilight very much.
November 25, 2008 4:34 PM
twilight fan said:
this movie is so kool... i wish i could be like edward...he is so kool... and ikr scary...wich i totaly diggg... this movie is the best since i seen bat man dark night...but this one is way way way better..i cant waait for the next one to come out...
November 25, 2008 4:44 PM
rebecca said:
Im 34 w/ 3 kids. I'm a total Twilight addict.as is my 12 yr.old daughter.LOVED THE MOVIE!!!
November 25, 2008 5:28 PM
Anonymous said:
"Dracula was not nor has he ever been REAL! Vampire stories, legends and lore, all of it comes from the imagination. "
Wrong.
Go read some history books (or at least wikipedia) about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlad_III_Dracula
November 26, 2008 10:47 AM
- - - said:
To Lacey:
When McMunkee said 'real' Dracula, he probably meant the original. Besides, in a way, Dracula was real.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlad_III_the_Impaler
Also... I'm one of those weird people who have zombie plans for their house, just in case.
November 26, 2008 10:50 AM
GO GO TRANSPORTER drdrdrdrD said:
Man this movie is nott good !!! this movie dosent need to be here it dosent deserve som much money i hate it its so bad!!! its old rutty and **** i whould say its not good dont see it if you dont like love!! peac out
GO GO TRANSPORTER drdrdrD
November 26, 2008 5:20 PM
Skiddi said:
WOOOOOOWWW sure the fans of the books and those who like the kind of category might love it, well... for us other...
...This movie was a really a long ride of one boring slow scene after the other more drama and more bitching, to summaries...
IT...
DID....
MOST...
CERTAINLY....
NOOOOOTTTT....
KICK ASS!
GO GO GO F UCKING TRANSPORTER!!
November 26, 2008 5:35 PM
moonlight said:
i love the movie so much
i love the actor that played Edward Cullen
Robert Pattinson is so hot!!
November 26, 2008 9:44 PM
frank the tank said:
having read 3 chapters of the book (ultimatly having to stop becuase i reached a point where i would rather take my life than continue reading) and now having seen the movie i cant help but wonder what is wrong with this society. i mean honestly do people have no taste this was positivly proposterous and i often bite my toungue on my sheer unadulterated loathing for this book becuase i fear that some overly obsessed teen will attack me if i express my opinion that this book is complete ****. sparkly vampires.... really.
November 27, 2008 2:40 PM
Twilight RoCkS!! said:
Twilight is amazing all I got to say! I HATE reading!!! My mom thought I was sick because I was reading...but it was so good there was no way I could stop reading it! Anyway the movie was really great! What does everyone expect! I mean come on of course the book is going to be better...if they put every little detail in the movie then it would be 10 hours long and is that really reality seriously! The acting was great! If you read the book the actors portrayed the characters spot on! People really need to chill out and stop thinking so much into it...just sit and enjoy the movie! Seriously who cares it's just a movie for fun! I LOVED IT! So don't go by the critics...go see it then you can have your opinion
November 27, 2008 8:18 PM
Shahd said:
What is this article TALKING ABOUT?!?! Soo wrong! 'Only dedicated fans to the book will love this movie'? NO. Thats B/S right there! Critics r just dumb middle-aged men who dont know crap about teenage romance and love. And I've go freakin proof that a lot of ppl who didnt even read the book, LOVED the movie. My friends went 2go c it w/me and they flat out LOVED the movie. Its hilarious, cute, romantic, and awkward. LIKE ITS SUPPOSED 2B! I mean, he tries not 2kill her the whole time, and hes IN LOVE w/her, how do u think hes gonna act?? giddy?! Ppl need 2 f***ing chill out. BEST MOVIE EVER. Best BOOK ever! OF course the book is better than the movie! Just like every other book w/a movie is! But it was still, a kick a** movie. The 2nd time I watched it, I enjoyed it better, bc I wasnt comparing it w/the book.. I was enjoying it! It had a lot of funny scense that I was going to blow soda out of my nose I was laughing so hard!! It was THE BEST. And u know what, if it wasnt so good, it wouldnt b making 6 million a day and one of the top box office movies AND there wouldnt b a sequel coming out in 2010! SO THERE! & There isnt so much Catherine could do w/a low budget. New Moon will do gr8 w/special affects bc it will have a ginormous budget from how many ppl r checkin out this movie. So for critics, boo-hoo. No 1 cares. Obviously 3/4 and more of the teens and adults who loved the movie dont agree. Adults, middle-aged ppl (woment mostly), teenage boys and girls, its not just a chick-flick! And if u think its that easy 2 fit a 500 page book into a movie, then u better think again. I do agree it coulda been a tad bit longer, and more scenes from the book should been in it, but it was still amazing. Ppl, rly, just take a chill pill, go c it w/a bunch of friends, and dont think about the book! U cant compare a book w/a movie! OF COURSE THE BOOK'LL B BETTER. Theory: ppl who read the book of a movie, and c the movie after, think the movie isnt that good, ppl who never read the book and go c the movie, LOVE the movie. Of course, it dsnt apply 2everyone, but some. So just go and watch it and enjoy it for what it is-- the gr8test vampire romance story, w/drama and action to top it off, the best u'll ever get. Cant wait for the sequel, although it'll probably make me cry : /
Anyways, this article is BOGUS, critics suck and their opinion doesnt matter--theres better proof that the movie rocked, and thats that its making 6 million a day, more than all the other box office movie, and rising 2fame like crazy! GO TWILIGHT!! ♥
November 27, 2008 10:05 PM
Nnea said:
I don't think the review is accurate. There had been so much hype about this movie and I had not, and still haven't read any of the books in the series, so I felt the movie would be a flop and complete waste of my time. I wanted to wait and see how it fared in its opening weekend, but to my surprise, it made over $65 million, so someone obviously liked it. I went to see it tonight with no expectations at all. In fact, from scene to scene, I kept expecting it to be exactly the junk I thought it would be, but it kept getting better and better and it is actually a very good movie. The review is too harsh. I guess the writer obviously has not seen "The Happening" this year for them to give a movie as good as this such a bad review..trust me, there have been a lot of bad movies out this year and the movie "Twilight" is definately not one of them...not even close. So go see it.
November 29, 2008 8:50 PM
AJ said:
I have to say, it would be a little confusing if you didn't read the book but I thought the actors did a pretty damn good job! Edward is impossible to play and the actor did great, the girl who played Bella wasn't bad either.
The book was better but remember in the movie they can't fit everything in the book,books have to have more details, to be more explanatory, thats why the books better. And if they did everything from the book it would be 4 hours long.
I give the movie 4 out of 5.
And I'm a dude and I'm not gay just cause I read the books and saw the movie, so if you think so, screw you.
December 1, 2008 2:26 PM
Sunshine said:
I saw the movie and asked my friend to lend me the book I already read the book and I'm going to get the second book today. Let me tell you I don't like to read, but this book I can't stop reading I just love it. I'm dying for the second movie to come out. I give the movie a 5 out of 5.
December 2, 2008 5:38 AM
kiko-ever said:
this movie is nice ~
love it .
romance and sweet .
edward is so handsome .
and bella is so pretty ~
love them so much ....
December 3, 2008 4:46 AM
Fayez Hasyemi from jakarta said:
a movie = awesome .
two thumbs .
December 4, 2008 9:43 AM
Dan87 said:
This Review is such bull****,
There is no blandness what so ever in this movie!!!!
And too bad I have already seen it 3 times so I dont know where their getting this idea that people will only see it once and forget about it.
And I dont understand how it will confuse "everyone else", these critics are retarted.
The movie is amazing, everything about it is perfect. Its romantic but not mooshy, there isnt too much violence or gore. Theres enough action to keep you on your toes.
Everytime I watch this movie I get goosebumps so Clearly its a movie worth watching and i will forever be a fan.
December 4, 2008 10:19 PM
rosalia daphne said:
i just love the books..
December 5, 2008 9:14 PM
Vince said:
I Like this movie, beautiful scenery and i love the scene when they play baseball on tundher storm. Romantic drama with a little bit action. Light sweet.
December 11, 2008 9:19 PM
Bhamikorn said:
this review is such an ugly review.
the person who wrote is such an stupid brain.
December 12, 2008 1:20 AM
zhang said:
So Romantic!
December 12, 2008 1:54 AM
maria said:
ummm....actually i have to disagree with that review. i haven't read the books, never even heard of them. i came across the movie by mistake, someone suggested i see it, and i did. i didn't scratch my head when i saw it, on the contrary, i loved it and i'm not even a teen, ok, maybe at heart but still...i thought the movie was great, so the special effects weren't all that great but it's understandable. the actors i thought were spot on. maybe bella wasn't perfect at times but i was happy to overlook that because the movie captivated me, the way it was shot, the music, the story, i thought everything was great. so now i'm hooked on twilight, the movie actually made me wanna read the books, not the other way around. sorry to disagree but that's the way it is and i don't think i'm the only one.
December 13, 2008 5:21 PM
E.cuLLen said:
I think twilight is the best movie i've ever seen in my life....^^
December 17, 2008 6:33 PM
watutalkinbout said:
what the heck????? have you even read the books?? dont go wasting your time on giving this movie a bad review!!!i am a HUGE fan of twilight and your article makes me want to cry. sure it may have some cheesey parts, but any book you read does. like Harry Potter.Twilight is so awesome and aparrently you dont have any taste for it. so dont go and piss off some teenage girls because of your self lack of taste. Oh ya! and if twilight was rated a two star on your damn reviews, then why was-no-IS it the number one movie in america? so put that in your pipe and smoke it, cuz twilight rox!!!!!!oh and the haters- BACK OFF, TWILIGHT ROCKS!!!!!
December 17, 2008 8:52 PM
Boris said:
I agree with Maria, I have the same opinion. I am kind of embarrassed as it's mostly the girls who I have seen at cinemas that watch it.
December 17, 2008 11:03 PM
E-MAN said:
I am a middle school kid (13)and every girl in my school has or is reading this dam ennoying book.I read the first book becuase my reading teacher made me . I instanly hated it I couldnt even finish reading it when it the teast came i just copied the kid in front of me and got a A-. WHEN THE MOVIE CAME OUT ARE TEACHER MADE A FIELDTRIP to go see it and when we saw it even the obsessed girls hated it
December 18, 2008 2:39 PM
no longer a teen said:
Hi,
I have to say I am a pretty big fan of the books, but if I had seen the movie before I read the book, I would never have bought the book. I found the movie to be badly filmed, too many close ups, the director was great with "Thirteen" but not with this, she got no acting out of the leads, though I feel that Pattinson has great possibilities. The bits that I would consider poignant to the story were cut out, there making their love seem silly and out of no where. Though I did not like the movie I would go see the sequel when it comes out because I loved the books.
December 21, 2008 8:17 PM
Emily said:
Hey everyone?
Yeah i thought the movie Twilight was awesome! I'm going to see it again with my mate in 2 weeks can't wait. I knew from the start that edward was a vampire cause it was kinda ovious but he was a good vampire and I thought the two were really cute together I know he was abit of a loner but they developed a really good friendship and the two became very close and he was also really overprotective of her which was really really cute* I'd love a vampire friend like Edward he actually turned out to be a really amazing down to earth bloke? Edward & Bella I was really really happy for the two glad they worked out! Bella is a beautiful person with a good heart & deserves to be happy!
Edward is an amazing person with a good heart & also very kind & down to earth!
Love you *Edward* & *Bella* you rock my sox! X0XOX0X
December 22, 2008 4:05 AM
Anonymous said:
Hey all,
So I dragged my husband to see Twilight on opening night and just like everyone else I had to laugh at all the teens screaming when Edward said things like "hi"...and after having to hit my husband over a dozen times for falling asleep I left the theater loving the movie. Just like everyone else I read all 4 books in about 2 nights...and 1 thing someone else said was when your reading the books you put your heart into it and you heart creates images and feelings that unless you made the movie no one could re create. When I was finished with the last book I honestly had the feeling of total emptieness in me (which at 28 I am not completley proud of saying ..hahah!) but really i was like...i want more!!
I agree with the statment that if you read the book and were expecting it to be the book you would be disapointed. But I am a major Harry Potter fan as well and learned my lesson with those movies so for what was put into Twilight I thought it was amazing..Yes some special effects could have been done better, but I can assure you the next 1 will be that big block buster budget movie. I feel that a lot of critics took the movie for what it was and thats all...but you really needed to be open minded if you hadnt read all the books as to what to expect. I loved Twilight and cant wait to see more!!!
December 26, 2008 1:31 PM
Jade said:
does it matter what one critic thinks?
i thoguht the film was amazing, the next person may think it was awful. it doesnt matter what anyone else thinks about it, reviews are pointless.
December 28, 2008 11:20 AM
mojtaba said:
u cant wait for watch....
December 29, 2008 9:46 AM
cody cullen said:
OK...the movie really was made for twilight book FANS....i mean the movie was a work of art and was just soooo great. the best moive ever and as a twiligth MAJOR fan i understand it completely but for people of the streets neva read twilight b4 they can't really get what is going on. like bella she never really showed much emotion in the 1st one she was always really acward and everything...and edward isn't exactly a loner...he and the other cullens Alica, Rosalie, Jaspar and Emmett they all seem to stay together considering they are vampires and could kill everbody in the room. but to truly understand and feel the real passion in twilight you need to start from the begining the book.
i have said forever that it was intended for the fans and will say that till i meet the grave.
I LOVE TWILIGHT BEST EVA
AND I AM SO INLOVE WITH EDWARD CULLEN (L)
December 30, 2008 4:33 AM
Kara said:
these peopl are stupid
the movie was AMAZING!
i've read the books
&& thought it was the best movie ever!
January 2, 2009 6:08 PM
Chelsey said:
I agree those people are stupid. I've read all four books and I think the director did an amazing job recreating it on the big screen, and the whole part about only liking it if you read it, my boyfriend went with me to watch the movie, and he totally despised the whole twilightness because i was literally obsessed with Edward Cullen, but he actually really enjoyed it. It's a great movie, and you all just need to get over yourselves because it was simply amazingg!
January 3, 2009 11:16 AM
Freely said:
The part where Cullen was boucing around, squatting about the trees and reappearing in the forest was...comical, yet I was laughing alone in my seat. However, he really was beautiful to look at - perhaps in the sequel he bounces around in the nude and it's rated R or something to allow this (not sure why a vampire movie would EVER be rated PG-13 - the whole point is for it to be sexy as hell). I did not read the book first, was pleasantly surprised with the skin like diamonds bit (an interesting take on vampires). The girl can't act to save her life and intentionally stutters a lot which makes her sound like a retard. I really enjoyed how the family looked: the "modern vamp," slightly constipated and recently electrocuted. I saw it twice and can't wait for next December; hopefully by then they will recaste the chick and Cullen will play a larger role ;) As for the negative critiques, I can only surmise they don't have a love for "vampiction" like the rest of us lost souls...
January 4, 2009 7:42 PM
pauL said:
Twilight,,,
Twilight,,,
Twilight,,,
There is notHin can say,,,
buT twilight,,,
jusT twilight,,,
_ T W I L I G H T _
January 5, 2009 2:22 AM
ELY said:
I adored the books but....
the movie kinda sucked
I thought It was going to be much better but it wasnt.
I didnt like the way Kristen Stewart acted. she could have done much better.
and for Robert Pattinson, he could have show more emotion he was kinda lame.
BUT at the end I LOVED THE MOVIE specially the books they are GREAT
=}
January 5, 2009 8:58 PM
.. said:
the book was great i mean i loved it. but like many have said i think the movie will only appeal to those who have devoted a chunk of their lives reading the 4 books. i think the movie was kinda slow or something, they might not have been the best actors but its kinda just the beggining of their careers. i think the movie had a chance to become sooo much better, but oh well, not every one has the same taste. but over all out of 5 id give it 3.5.
January 6, 2009 3:49 AM
Steph Sharples said:
The book was great but I have to admit this movie was not very good. I walked out of the theater thinking- what was that? Many of them need to take some acting lessons immediately. There were too many unintentional funny scenes. Anyways, some blame can be placed on its budget- action sequences and special effects were terrible.
January 6, 2009 11:47 AM