3 Stars 2 Bucks

My Sister's Keeper

by Mark Keizer

posted June 25, 2009 7:12 AM

The director of The Notebook successfully holds together another 5-hankie drama

With money no object during Hollywood’s summertime snake oil sell-a-thon, filmmakers have mastered amazing feats of engineering to provide you, the viewer, with unprecedented levels of realism. But putting aside Autobots and starships, the one feat of engineering that goes underappreciated during beach season is the mid-budget, girlie-girl, 5-hankie drama. This is because summer is when guys get their nerd on. Women are an afterthought. My Sister’s Keeper is a femme-targeted cry-a-thon. And while that usually means a bruising round of manipulative pap, My Sister’s Keeper is a rare tearjerker where the viewer doesn’t feel jerked around (most of the time). And that’s a special effect that all the wizards at ILM can’t create. This story of a brave teenager’s final battle with leukemia and its effect on her family is meant to be savvy counterprogramming against Transformers 2. But a cancer weepie is a way heavier proposition than a lost-love weepie, so look for returns less stellar than director Nick Cassavetes’ last E-ticket ride to 5-hankie Heaven, The Notebook.

This mild summer surprise is based on the novel by Jodi Picoult, and if Cassavetes and Jeremy Leven’s adaptation has any fault it’s porting over too many intriguing avenues for the movie to properly explore. Teenager Kate Fitzgerald (Sofia Vassilieva) has leukemia. She contracted the illness at a young age. So young in fact that parents Sara and Brian (Cameron Diaz and Jason Patric) used in vitro fertilization to conceive Anna (Abigail Breslin) for the sole purpose of providing cord blood, lymphocytes, bone marrow and other bodily whatnots to keep Kate alive. And, as Kate’s genetic match, she has dutifully done so for 11 years, until Kate needs a kidney and the family turns to Anna. The pre-teen, however, is tired of the painful medical procedures and drug cocktails. So she hires attorney Campbell Alexander (Alec Baldwin), he of the billboards and TV commercials, to help her win medical emancipation, meaning her parents can no longer force her to assist Kate. It’s a provocative setup, but it accounts for most of what doesn’t work about the movie. If Anna were really suing her own mother, there’d be a heck of a lot more tension in the Fitzgerald household. And the emancipation thread predictably culminates in the type of courtroom scene that only happens in movies. But this is not a courtroom drama (although the judicial scenes are greatly enhanced by a terrific Joan Cusack, stern yet sympathetic in a small role). Kate is clearly and slowing dying and each family member is going to have to figure out how to accept it and process it. But Sara can’t and the family risks being damaged by her treatment of Kate, which gets more ferocious as Kate’s condition gets more hopeless. While not the obvious choice for the role, a deglammed Diaz makes a good Sara, whose single-mindedness could have become psychotic in the hands of a strictly dramatic actress. Since the story is told from multiple viewpoints, with each character introducing themselves with their own voice over, everyone gets their angle explored. The Fitzgerald men, of course, get the shortest shrift. Firefighter Brian and only son Jesse (Evan Ellingson) aren’t plumbed with the same depth as the female characters. But that’s acceptable, not only because Jesse is designed to be the forgotten son, but because most of America’s men will be sitting in the next auditorium watching Transformers 2. But the Fitzgerald women ably carry the day. Breslin plays Anna as strong, but not preternaturally or precociously so, while Vassilieva is simply fearless. She’s put through the medical-drama ringer (there’s plenty of vomiting and nosebleeds) but never asks for the audience’s pity. And her brief romance with fellow cancer patient Taylor (Thomas Dekker) gives her, and the audience, some romantic moments so the movie isn’t a 108-minute death march.

As the director of The Notebook, Cassavetes is no tourist in this town. But he’s got plenty of thematic plates to juggle and some rise higher than others. He’s fairly tough on these women, without being cruel or letting things slip into utter shamelessness. Also, when not assaulting our ears with the pushy and lame songs, he’s comfortable with quiet. With her days numbered, Kate must drink in moments normally taken for granted and Cassavetes gives her those moments, like when Brian liberates his dying daughter from the hospital for a day at the beach.

Some will say that emphasizing the ethical and moral questions surrounding “designer babies” would have resulted in a more interesting movie. And that’s probably true. But My Sister’s Keeper is not a think piece, so let’s be glad that any thinking is involved at all. The movie is really about emancipation, and not just Anna’s quest for medical emancipation. Everyone in the Fitzgerald family needs to be released. And there’s only one way that can happen.

Distributor: Warner Bros.
Cast: Cameron Diaz, Abigail Breslin, Sofia Vassilieva, Alec Baldwin, Jason Patric and Joan Cusack
Director: Nick Cassavetes
Screenwriter: Jeremy Leven and Nick Cassavetes
Producers: Stephen Furst, Mendel Tropper, Mark Johnson, Chuck Pacheco and Scott L. Goldman
Genre: Drama
Rating: PG-13 for mature thematic content, some disturbing images, sensuality, language and brief teen drinking.
Running time: 109 min
Release date: June 26, 2009

8 Comments

steve said:

i am a guy i cant wait too het my tears on it. not ashamed of being a crier

June 26, 2009 4:02 AM

Bill said:

I saw it and really liked itd despite the opinion of some critics that the vomiting and blood scenes were over the top. That is a poor representation of the movie which presents the stark reality of a child dying of cancer and the difficult problems it can create for the famlies involved. Good Job!

June 28, 2009 9:05 AM

Anonymous said:

I saw the movie and I thought it was very well put together. I cried my eyes out the whole time. Not only, because it was sad, but because it was such a wonderful movie to have made me feel the emotions portrayed. BTW, I am a guy.

June 29, 2009 4:50 PM

millissa said:

the movie was just ok. i could have been more haertfelt.

June 30, 2009 12:15 PM

AirCavRick said:

This 61 year old Vietnam vet saw the film and cried my eyes out. Of course, I knew I would do that; I am a trailer checker and had seen the trailers. Regardless, this is a provocative and moving film. Only those with hearts and heads should invest in a ticket for this film. The payback is wonderful!

July 12, 2009 9:50 PM

Michael said:

I absolutely loved this movie. It was sad, but it was wonderful. I didn't do my crying until after it was over, but I'll admit a lot of it had to do with the fact that I can relate with the situation. My sister had cancer, and I watched it with my mom who cried during the whole movie because it reminded her of the same things she and my sister went through, so that was part of the reason for my crying. Either way, I still loved this movie and I definitely recommend it to anyone.

July 17, 2009 12:48 AM

AJ said:

sad but good.

July 17, 2009 9:50 AM

tenzin said:

Firstly i would like to thank jodi picoult for giving such an nice story which seems to be very much related to our harsh reality.movie was so nice n deeply moving . i couldnt control my self from shedding tears . it was so sad . this will be one of the best movie i had ever watched till date . thanks again.

September 27, 2009 10:45 PM

Leave a comment