9
posted August 19, 2009 11:04 AM
A different breed of animation
Shane Acker’s animated short won the Student Academy Award and earned an Oscar nomination in 2004, and here, he’s successfully turned the premise for that short into a full length ‘toon that falls somewhere between The Terminator and WALL-E (with the emphasis on the latter). About a small band of “creations” who try to save what’s left of civilization in a post-apocalyptic world, 9 is short in length (a scant 79 minutes including credits) but long on invention. 9 may not do anywhere near the business Coraline did for Focus Features but it should carve out some money in theaters before really cashing in on DVD.
Like the sadly underappreciated Battle For Terra, this Sci-fi, futuristic fantasy is one of the rare ‘toons these days not out for laughs. It’s easy to see why such esteemed producers and visual stylists as Tim Burton and Timur Bekmambetov (Wanted) would throw their considerable weight behind Acker’s ambition to turn his short into a feature length story—although not a whole lot of complexity has been added. Acker, with a script by Pamela Pettler (Monster House) is able to flesh out and add numerous characters in addition to its “star,” #9 (voiced by Elijah Wood), a visionary, stitched-together creation that quickly displays strong leadership qualities just when they are most needed.
In this penultimate version of the tale, nearly everyone can speak (unlike the previous version) and a starry cast is given ample opportunity to bring the characters to life.
These characters must come together to fight the evil machines that have taken over the planet, particularly a very menacing, marauding, mechanical beast that threatens everyone. As most of the human population has been completely destroyed, this small band of unique beings was given a glimmer of hope and life by a scientist in the final days before the end. They continue to thrive against long odds versus the all-powerful controller known as The Great Machine.
Among the main players we get to know are #1 (Christopher Plummer), a war vet and longtime leader; #2 (Martin Landau), an older inventor; #’s 3 and 4, twins who communicate silently with each other; #5 (John C. Reilly), the engineer; #6 (Crispin Glover), an overly creative soul lost in his own world; #7 (Jennifer Connelly), a strong self-starter and ace warrior; #8 (Fred Tatasciore), a dim bulb assistant to #1. Each of these flawed but appealing stitchpunk creations come together under the inspired vision of #9 and set out to create a new beginning in the shadow of so much death and destruction.
Acker’s visuals in detailing the mission of this makeshift community are stunning, a visual splendor the director says was inspired by the bombed-out European cities in World War II and the fantasy artwork of Zdzislaw Beksinski. He succeeds in a way that ought to keep moviegoers of all ages (maybe not under 8) glued to the screen.
9 (sure to be confused in title only with Rob Marshall’s upcoming musical, Nine), is a brilliantly animated and welcome treat for moviegoers searching for adventure, inspiration and complete originality.
Distributor: Focus Features
Cast: Elijah Wood, Christopher Plummer, Martin Landau, John C. Reilly, Crispin Glover, Jennifer Connelly and Fred Tatasciore,
Director: Shane Acker
Screenwriter: Pamela Pettler
Producers: Jim Lemley, Tim Burton, Timur Bekmambetov, Jinko Gotoh and Dana Ginsburg
Genre: Animated Fantasy
Rating: PG 13 for violence and scary images
Running time: 79 min.
Release date: September 9, 2009
9 Comments
Leave a comment





Joel Tallent said:
I don't think you used the word "penultimate" correctly. Second to last version of the tale?
September 1, 2009 12:13 PM
O. Verher said:
Joel's right.
September 11, 2009 1:47 PM
anonymous said:
lol
who cares what penultimate means? but way to freak out there, sir. you wrote a damn good article but then freak out when some grammar nazis start saying "ur doin it rong". you shouldn't get so upset over random comments made by trolls on teh internets, nor should you make a fool of yourself by overreacting to their silly criticism of your article. the article is fine, but, dude, chill out.
September 11, 2009 9:32 PM
uzustar said:
yeah i agree with anonymous said,jus know u wrote an awsome article
September 11, 2009 11:17 PM
Anonymous said:
"I take the time to write a decent god damn article" --- all the more reason to proof read it?
September 12, 2009 6:40 AM
Ninal said:
I just saw the film last night and I will say that it certainly didn't lack at all in the action arena though it left lots to be desired on the story side. Plus, the ending was anti-climatic because you already knew what was coming, you could figure it all out on your own. But it was a fun movie, and certainly original and dealt with deeper issues of the human soul rather than lifeless robots. Great directing, great concept, just needed a little better script. Sorry Pamela!
September 12, 2009 8:53 AM
Anonymous said:
Movie was interesting, animation was great, but every scene was like a rip off of all the great sci-fi's of the 20th century... I mean I felt like I was watching a bang up of runaway meets terminator meets matrix... this was a great idea lacking in depth and development and beyond the creative concept and animation has ZERO originality...
September 14, 2009 9:02 AM
Anonymous said:
oh yeah and aliens too... and Im sure a few more... road warrior, lost in space... Im mean really guys HOW MUCH WEED DID YOU SMOKE when you came up with the storyboards for this
September 14, 2009 9:05 AM
Anonymous said:
Why do people complain when a film consists of ideas from several seminal ones. Surely a film that is a collage of all the best bits is still a good film? What with most ideas having already been done originality is becoming a rarity so you should expect more films that are a blend of previous ones. Just be glad when a director manages to do this well and make it entertaining.
October 26, 2009 1:15 AM