The Box
posted November 5, 2009 2:25 PM
Far from pressing
Donnie Darko director Richard Kelly takes a stab at adapting fantasy writer Richard Matheson’s short story Button, Button. What results is the opposite of pressing. Rod Serling could have said everything The Box says in nearly two hours and compress it into one thirty-minute episode of the Twilight Zone—and he’d have made it more compelling. In fact, he may have. With the low-budget Paranormal Activity still going strong and The Fourth Kind also hitting multiplexes, this inchoate thriller is unlikely to earn substantial coin. Sci-fi lovers should find it risible, and those who devalue the genre will have their biases confirmed.
A deep economic recession is an opportune time to release a film that hinges on a married couple’s choice between obtaining much-needed cash and harming an anonymous fellow human being. The Sci-fi elements of such a scenario could be jettisoned with no harm done to the movie’s financial performance. But because The Box has the speculative source material that it does, and since the paranormal is definitely not out of vogue, that wasn’t an option.
A mish-mash of hokum posing as deep thought, The Box considers what transpires when Norma and Arthur Lewis (Cameron Diaz and James Marsden) are told that if they press the button on a device mysteriously delivered to their home two things will happen: someone they don’t know will die and they will receive a million tax-free dollars. The time is 1976. The place: Richmond, Virginia. Arthur is a NASA engineer working on the Viking mission to Mars and Norma teaches literature at the private school their son attends. (On her syllabus, Sartre’s No Exit.) Years ago, she lost the toes on one foot in a freak X-ray accident and walks with a limp. Now she’s due for another operation. Adding to their financial woes, Arthur’s hopes of joining the astronaut corps are dashed. The courtly man that appears on their doorstep wearing a charcoal grey topcoat and Bromberg poses this proposition on behalf of his unnamed employers. His name is Arlington Steward (Frank Langella) and one-quarter of his face is missing.
Not cogent and barely coherent, the tale writer/director Kelly spins is short on action and special effects. As the slow-burn tension builds, so does our sense of bewilderment. Are we dealing with an alien invasion and/or abduction? A vast government conspiracy? Is it a case of a madman with no access to reconstructive plastic surgery? What’s with all the bloody noses and the zombies lurking outside the Lewis residence, marching through the public library and working as parking valets and waiters at a family wedding? The Galaxy Motel is a locus of intrigue, apparently extraterrestrial, and at the library Arthur gets a glimpse of the beyond after passing through a portal that functions like a burst waterbed.
As for the moral choice the Lewis’ face, it’s strictly kid stuff, mixing the micro and the macro in a confusing manner that never plausibly or imaginatively accounts for the movie’s many dangling threads. Arthur and Norma must make a second decision during the climax—it involves their son, about whom we don’t care a wit by the way. The bogus existentialism on offer relies on references to something called the “altruism coefficient,” as well as to the works of Sartre. As far as I can tell, it all comes down to a classic (read: tired) dynamic in speculative literature: some entity or force much bigger than man (it might even be God) tests the moral fiber of the human race.
Macabre and mysterious in the hokiest of ways, The Box couldn’t be a less life-altering movie about a “life-altering proposition.” The invocation of Arthur C. Clarke’s Third Law— “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic”—seems like a bad joke. Not only is the substance a jumble but with the exception of Steward’s digitally-mangled visage, there’s nothing distinguished about the production values. At one point, Steward observes that we humans are wont to put ourselves in boxes—such as the houses we live in, the cars we drive and the caskets we end up in. He neglects to mention movie theaters. That’s one type of box it’s within our power to avoid.
Distributor: Warner Bros.
Cast: Cameron Diaz, James Marsden, Frank Langella, James Rebhorn, Holmes Osborne, Sam Oz Stone, Gillian Jacobs and Celia Weston
Director/Screenwriter: Richard Kelly
Producers: Richard Kelly, Dan Lin, Kelly McKittrick and Sean McKittrick
Genre: Sci-fi/Thriller/Drama
Rating: PG-13 for thematic elements, some violence and disturbing images.
Running time: 115 min.
Release date: November 6, 2009
15 Comments
Leave a comment





CaptBackslap said:
There's no "could have" about The Box being a Twilight Zone episode. It was an actual episode (with the same title as the original story) of the 1980s Twilight Zone revival. It was a solid episode, but I certainly don't recall thinking, "man-oh-man, I really wish this was five times as long!" when I was watching it.
November 5, 2009 7:00 PM
m lyman said:
Its been a long time since I felt cheated out of my money when seeing a movie. You get the whole movie in the trailer. Just watch that.
I spent the whole time wanting to get up and leave, but hoping that something would resolve or change or become more clear about this shallow story. Sure the attempts to make it a deep sci fi movie are there... but fails miserably. I would be embarrassed to be cameron diaz. WOW. In fact I dont think I have seen a worse movie.
November 7, 2009 6:44 AM
jatedd said:
This was the biggest waste of time and money. I loved Twilight Zone but this was a stupid movie. Seven of us went to see it and all of us were very dissapointed.
November 7, 2009 7:21 AM
Anonymous said:
The movie is a complete waste. What happened to having a plot with a happy ending rather than a stupid miss given endless unending dribble.
November 7, 2009 1:51 PM
James said:
It started out good but then quickly gets confusing. Don't hold your breath waiting for the end to make sense of it all. Aliens, government conspiracy, God? The movie ends and leaves you thinking "Theres no way thats the end. I seriously paid money to see that?" Parts were cool and it makes you think afterward but only because you are forced to think to try to make any sense of it.
November 7, 2009 3:06 PM
Anonymous said:
This movie was terrible. i have a few questions about the film since the cat is out the bag.
1.What is with the southern accents?
2.Why does the movie take place in the 70's
3.why were there noses bleeding?
the movie was whack box office
November 7, 2009 5:19 PM
Boogie Down said:
Yo! This movie was whiggity-whiggity whack! What was the deal with the deformities? and Yo! What was good with the with the "Husband trapped in the water over the bed scene" son?! And what was really good with the water contraption in the NASA warehouse B? I'm mad i snuck in that piece.
God dont like ugly son. this movie was horrendous! i wouldn't give my worst enemy 2 tickets to see this movie with his girlfriend dun. REAL SPIT!!!
November 7, 2009 5:30 PM
Julien said:
Maybye this movie seemed more promising that the movie we finally get. However, Richard Kelly really succeeded in building a special sci-fi atmosphere inside the 70s. He is for sure a promising director, and I'm quite happy to see his movies. Something special will happen one day. We have detected it from his first movie, Donny Darko. The box is somewhere not successfully completed but I really don't share your opinions :)
November 8, 2009 1:45 AM
Dragonfly said:
This movie was such a disappointment... It was slow, some what difficult to understand, and had a very stupid open ending.
November 8, 2009 10:48 AM
Nilotic said:
This movie sawed open my skull with a buzz saw, then leveled a double barrel shotgun at the exposed tissue and blew the brains out of the back of my head.
That's how amazing it was!
I loved every second of the movie. It was very thought-provoking and will have me spinning and philosophizing about mankind more; just like I always do. We truly are the experiment. But people don't like to think; especially when it's about ourselves.
When the camera is pointed at us, we don't want to watch ourselves on screen.
November 8, 2009 3:56 PM
Ray said:
This movie was absolutely incredible! i think it is meant to be watched by people of higher intelligence then the ones raving against it on this site. Give it a try and dont turn down any of the theories as you watch.
November 9, 2009 7:15 AM
Anonymous said:
Someone asked why the noses were bleeding. It was brain hemorrhaging from the mind control/alteration. Kinda like in butterfly effect.
November 9, 2009 11:05 PM
Aod said:
Hi all,
I just go to the cinema to watching "The Box".
While i am watching i am felling exciting all the time.I'm from Thailand.
November 11, 2009 8:42 PM
Grace said:
The movie was not only confusing but a waste of time and money. As soon as I think I have it figured out I find myself even more confused. I dont know if it was a mixture of religions pick a door or be eternally damned, alien abduction to test the hearts of mankind, the women were the ones making the choices and the men watched and complained after the fact like Adam in the garden of Eden. I heard one movie goer say someone should have pushed the button on the movie!
November 14, 2009 12:39 PM
Rich said:
A joke and waste of 2 hours. Go outside and take a walk - feel good rather than suffer through this garbage. Lowest rating
November 15, 2009 6:39 AM